Archive for the ‘Everyday Dimwits’ Category

How to Go Insane

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

This is probably the most useless thing I’ve ever written (I’m sure some folks would dispute that), since everyone interested in following these instructions is already doing it. But I’m close to 100 percent sure they do what they’re supposed to do, because I’ve seen them put into practice, with great success, so many times.

Thought I’d jot ’em down. Enjoy.

Scared the Babums

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

Scary!Looks like someone is going to try to make an issue out of how kid-friendly the grocery stores are, or aren’t. I hope like the dickens that someone fails.

A North Texas mother said a Wal-Mart Halloween display gave her three daughters nightmares.

Adriana Whitney, of Hurst, said she and her daughters saw the life-size Halloween decoration while grocery shopping.

“It looked like a real, live monster,” 4-year-old Grace Whitney said.

The display, complete with a gory head that popped off, was by Wal-Mart’s front door. Adriana Whitney said she didn’t expect to see something like it while shopping for groceries. She said it was too much for her three young daughters, the youngest of whom is 20 months old.

See, this is one of those things of which I’m quite sure, but upon which very few agree with me. It is the basis of Item #22 on the When I Start Running This Place list, which places a bounty on the head of whoever invented those damnable children’s shopping carts.

Simply put, folks, kids don’t belong in grocery stores. They don’t belong there any more than your dog’s fecal matter belongs on the sidewalk. Somehow, because once upon a time it would have imposed an inconvenience on someone, somewhere, to be expected to keep their adorable crumb-cruncher out of the household foodstuff-hunting expedition, we got this nonsensical dictum that this is the way things are supposed to be done.

Well, it isn’t. If I wasn’t such a big believer in the right of businesses to determine how they should be lawfully run, “When I Start Running This Place #22” would be much more draconian. Something about how you may take your children under sixteen years old grocery shopping with you…if and only if shopping for groceries involves killing something. Like what you see in this movie here. That kind of “shopping” you have to learn to do when you’re fairly young.

Let’s face facts: What we do nowadays, is about as undemanding as it can possibly get. It is emasculating. This is never more evident than when a man goes out and does it. Let me break it down for you: He pulls a crumpled up paper out of his pocket, covereed with cryptograms that are as stylish in penmanship as they are illegible in substance. He follows these instructions someone else gave him, as close as he can…doing no thinking for himself, none whatsoever. Like a little boy instructed by his second-grade teacher how to clean the blackboard erasers or empty the trash. He stares in confusion at the pork chops, or the feminine hygeine products, or the coffee creamers, and then back at his instructions, with the inside tips of his eyebrows edging toward the ceiling…another tip-off to masculinity’s imminent, or recent-past, demise.

The next thing he has to do, that manly men don’t do or shouldn’t have to do, is whip out a cell phone in order to obtain further instructions. If masculinity has sunk beneath the waves before, this is where it tumbles into a bottomless fissure on the ocean’s bottom, never to be seen again. The real irony with the additional-instructions ritual is this: Whatever insignificant residue is left of what was his dignity an hour before, is stripped away most thoroughly if he has shown competence in the very few manly attributes he was called upon to use. Because in that case, when he says he isn’t able to find something, as a thinking, perceiving, objective-fulfilling hunting gathering manly man, if it was there he would have found it. Which means the store doesn’t have it.

This will be his fault. That’s the bitter irony. The guy who lacks not only masculine dignity, but ability as well, is thought to be a nominally more pleasing masculine figure because with a little bit more guidance from the “brains” of the family outfit, he can mutter “oh, okay honey, now I see it” and thus fulfill the mission. The guy who has surrendered his dignity, but retains the ability, frustrates his lady by presenting an unsolved puzzle that she, likewise, cannot solve. Mission failed; nothing pleasing about that.

I know what I’m talking about. I’ve been both of those guys, at one time or another.

And so that second guy will fail to please his mistress, and be subjected to some unknown number of “are you sure” inquiries followed by a raspy sigh. And this is the final indignity. His masculinity is not simply forcefully stolen from him, it is re-defined. By someone who’s supposed to have picked him, because she needed the masculinity he was supposed to bring to the table in the first place — someone who now imagines this to be something along the lines of following instructions. Someone who cannot be pleased; someone who can only be disappointed. And now is.

Now, admittedly, those who endure this gelding ritual with good cheer, have endurance that I don’t have. A lot of gals would then argue they are more “manly” than I. They’re right — provided we agree that manliness has no meaning beyond the tolerance of humiliation without complaint. Some of us would have hoped it still has something to do with seeing what needs doing, making decisions, and acting on those decisions with all the competence required. But those who re-define masculinity to the beast-of-burden stuff must have some kind of a point; they are far-and-away in the majority now.

Grocery shopping, I mean the pussified kind that involves pushing a cart around a bunch of aisles, whipping out my cell phone to get more instructions, and getting back some guff — really does wear on me. If masculinity in 2007 is defined in terms of the ability to endure this ritual cheerfully, I must confess to my failure in matching what even the average man has, let alone in showing any surplus above that. But I do have one thing to say in my defense.

I’d be able to put up with it much longer and with far less stress for everyone if you’d leave your brats at home.

This ritual I’ve outlined above, is not only devoid of masculinity to the point that it re-defines manhood into some caricature of it’s former self — there is a more salient point I wish to make about it, one more germane to my primary complaint. It can be learned, in life, anytime. Kids don’t need to go. At all. There’s no reason for them to be there. Some will say it is necessary to do this. They’re simply wrong. You can have the Dad watch them. Unless the Dad is being subjected to the humiliating ritual I’ve described, in which case, the Mom can watch them. Some will insist that’s not fair, what about the single-moms. The single-moms, themselves, have moms. If they don’t, they can hire a sitter — although I would expect, and certainly hope, that by now we are talking about a very narrow range of people.

I’m not saying women raising kids by themselves have it easy. They don’t. I’ve personally known quite a few of them. I have yet to meet one that didn’t have some kind of support system, be it family or friends — something. Some resource that could be deployed for an hour or two while the shopping gets done.

Kids don’t need to be in grocery stores. If I ran the country, we’d have far fewer customs and devices to make it enjoyable or expedient to bring them in. And if I owned a store, I’d make it dang nigh impossible, or at least, impractical. I’d buy one of those cartoon figurines off some amusement park that was being demolished, you know, the ones with the yardstick or limbo bar that says “you must be this tall…”

…or, with apologies to Ms. Whitney of Hurst, TX, maybe I’d get hold of the Halloween figure that scared her babums. Put that sucker up there, year ’round. As for public relations, I can certainly find a way to spin this if I try. How about “we are protecting our merchandise from contamination and destruction by keeping the brats away from it, and passing the savings on to you, while significantly enhancing your shopping experience.” Isn’t that a nice spin? How much other spin are we accustomed to seeing, each and every day of our lives that is far crappier, less sincere, and more forced & awkward.

I’m tellin’ ya. Put me in charge of some of these problems, and with the right attitude they’re so easy you have to wonder what all the fuss was about. It’s just good engineering. Kids…grocery stores. They don’t go together. Whoever said they did? And for reasons that by now should be more than obvious, I’m laboring under some real misgivings about the idea that men should be in there. The married ones, anyway. Unless that happens to be where they work.

Accurasee II

Tuesday, September 25th, 2007

Once again, folks.

It’s important.

What is up with this stuff, anyway? Full moon or something?

The Adventures of Shushman

Monday, September 24th, 2007

This is how I know I’m getting older: One day last week the fellas at work and I were getting ready to break for lunch, and the subject briefly came up. If you could have any superpower in the world, what would it be?

I’m not interested in flying anymore. What I want, in terms of superpowers, is very simple: I want to single out one car at a time, and it’s okay with me if it has to be within fifty feet or so…I want to be able to point at it…and instantly jam any and all sound-producing electronic devices within that car into complete silence.

Shush“Wesley” (not his real name) sarcastically intoned that maybe I’d like to wave a magic wand and wish little kids off my lawn, too. That’s Wes for you, he likes to sarcastically intone things. I’ll get there, I’m sure. But for now, that’s all the superpower I want. Point at something, and suddenly, from that direction only, there is silence. Not just with the mind-numbing “boom boom boom” coming from convertibles with the tops down, but television sets too. I don’t even wish to thwart the will of anybody else, necessarily. I’m referring to commercials that cut in on the program I, myself, chose to watch. Ever have that happen? Like, you crank the volume up to about 60 or 70 so you can hear what people are saying — I dunno, maybe, revealing the “real killer” during a thriller/mystery — and some ass comes on and spends thirty seconds bludgeoning you into coming down to his used car lot at MAXIMUM volume.

As in…the walls shake.

Here you are, getting a migraine and/or giving one to your neighbors, listening to some dickhead from whom you didn’t want to hear in the first place.

As I get older, I get more sensitive to this. I don’t know why. Maybe it has something to do with these foot-long gray hairs coming out of my ears. Or, maybe my age is only part of the problem; maybe it’s environmental. Maybe the signals really are getting louder. Cars, radio, television.

Waitaminnit — kids aren’t electronic, are they. No. So, we don’t want my superpower to have anything to do with electronic devices. Just noise. Like, I’m the Invisible Girl, just not as good-looking, and I can throw down a “cone of silence” on things. Not block bullets, not project force fields, not turn myself invisible. Just throw that sound-proof bubble around one thing or another. That’s all. I’d give up immortality, immunity, rapid healing, super-strength, all that just to wave my hand at something and — poof.

It’d be great. One thing, though…rapidity would be key. I don’t want it to be like waiting for a badly fragmented computer to boot up. I’d want to stop people in mid-syllable; I get those migraines pretty quick. And I’d want to be conspicuous. None of that “Bewitched” nose-twitching thing. The boom-box or car or whelp makes noise, Morgan waves his hand, and — we can get back to the conversation we were having.

Ever do that with your car radio? I’m sure everyone has. The guy comes on, gives you the phone number at super-speed…does it again…does it a third time…does it a fourth time…gets ready to do it yet again and you mutter “aw, shaddap” and snap the thing off. It’s a great feeling. You can’t help but fantasize that the radio people are choosing that exact instant to monitor who’s listening and noticing that you chose that exact instant to tune out, and ultimately decided to fire whoever was responsible. Yes, it’s a highly unlikely and extravagant daydream. But I’m not the first person who ever had it, and I’m sure I’m not the last.

Accurasee, It’s Important

Friday, September 21st, 2007

Just ask this guy.

Omigawd, That’s a Dude?

Thursday, September 13th, 2007

Via Rick, we learn about this…person. I had a real “It’s Pat” moment when I found out it wasn’t female.

I should add that I’ve met my share of genderly nebulous individuals and they weren’t such incredibly whiny bitches.

However, it’s a real first for me to bump into a YouTube clip with over 700 video responses. Well done…uh…er…sir.

Things That Make Me Barf

Thursday, September 6th, 2007

Note To Self: If you’re still among the living in one year’s time — that’s September 5, 2008 — re-write this from scratch just to see if any of the items have changed. It’s rather obscene that the one-year-plus election season has given you such an opportunity (see Item #4).

1. That the Republican candidates at the debate tonight can take turns bashing Fred Thompson, who is not there to defend himself. Actually, it’s worse than that. It’s as if the democrats have taken seven years to say among themselves “Now that we all agree George W. You-Know-Who is an evil stupid idiot, let’s ingratiate ourselves with each other by showing off who can throw the most frequent and acrid insults his way,” and the Republicans all got together and said “Those democrats have the right idea, let’s do what they’re doing.” Oh okay, so now to be a politician, you have to all agree on a target, and see who does the best job tossing Molotov cocktails at that target. I remember when being conservative was all about being classy. Come to think of it, if I was 21 instead of 41, I’d still be able to say that…I remember when conservative, was all about classy. That time has past. This is a really, really sad thing. Screw all of you guys. Go Fred.

2. That what we call “scandals” have become devices to make sure conservatives are driven out of power, and liberals remain, and that so many people who pride themselves on following what we call “news,” remain charmingly ignorant of what’s going on in spite of the evidence paraded right in front of them, month in, month out. Studds stays in. Craig is out. Frank stays in. Lott is out. Kennedy stays in. Packwood is out. Clinton stays in. North is down. Reid is unharmed. Gingrich is forced out. Doolittle is still up, but on his way down. Pelosi and Feinstein stay in. De Lay is gone. Over and over and over again we see: When you look at what stinks, it’s a mixed bag between conservative Republicans and liberal democrats. But when you look at who resigns and who remains in power…things are so slanted toward the left-wing, it’s all but impossible to at least inspect the scandal as — just possibly — a cynical tool devised, designed and deployed to keep a certain faction in power. I mean, after a while you just have to ask…is it still not obvious to you people what’s going on? And why not, are you super-dense or something? Over the last decade…how many conservatives have stayed up, and how many liberals have tumbled down? Not that many of either, right? Yer bein’ played. It should have been obvious to you, years ago.

3. The Futility Argument. Blogger friend JohnJ noticed our liberals like to declare certain endeavors unworthy of human effort, due to perceived lack of potential for success. I was noticing this is true, but the liberals like to maintain a certain selectivity about this. They declare things futile that really aren’t…like…locking up people who commit violent crime, and keeping on doing it, until anybody who’d commit violent crime, is locked up. And then, as if to declare a bitter war on logic itself, they suddenly energize themselves to engage certain efforts that really are futile…like making sure we all have the same amount of material stuff, in the name of “economic justice.” That’s just one example. My theory is that to engage some kind of task that will demand energy over the long term, and might really be achievable, is such a frightening prospect that they don’t have the balls to do it. And so they declare anything that might be possible, to be impossible, abstain from doing it, and excoriate anybody who might see it as a worthy venture…instead retreating to the relative safety of things anyone with a brain knows is pure fantasy, like making sure we all have the same quantity and quality of toys. Engaging tasks that might actually be completed successfully, it seems, is pretty scary to some people. I want to barf when the people who are intimidated by this simple challenge, end up running things.

4. Our next election is on Tuesday, November 4th, 2008. It makes me want to barf when I realize I’ve been listening to people campaign — hardcore, in the traditional sense of campaigning, in every conceivable way — since February of 2007. That’s a big ol’ chunk of time. That’s twenty-one months of campaigning. This is truly obscene.

5. Really, really hot-looking women, wearing long pants.

6. When people make tenuous points of debate sound reasonable, that in reality aren’t anything close to it, by using sarcasm.

7. When people hold themselves out as some kind of super-brave martyrs, on the order of Mahatma Ghandi or Jesus Christ, by “speaking truth to power” in the United States of America, a country in which it’s unconstitutional to prosecute you just for saying stuff — a Utopian haven of safety for political dissidents if ever there was one in the history of the human race.

8. When someone memorizes the answers to a test for 24 hours or less, and therefore achieves some kind of coveted certification — and is therefore hailed as having “achieved” something, on par with a thinker and doer who invented a better mousetrap that actually saved money and/or limbs and/or lives. We don’t owe a damn thing to people with sheepskins on their walls. We owe what we have to people who saw what they saw, thought what they thought, concluded what they concluded, and did what they did. Which is a completely different thing from memorizing pre-canned answers for a portion of a single day, so that a test could be passed. Deep down, I think everyone knows this. That’s what makes me want to barf when so many people forget it.

9. Doofus Dad movies.

10. When politicians run for re-election on simple problem-solution platforms, when they already ran on it the previous election cycle. Like…”shoring up Social Security.” Or…”defending a woman’s right to choose.” Or…”making the minimum wage a living wage.” Or…”continuing our nation’s struggle for Civil Rights.” Seriously, a lot of these things go back thirty years, if not longer than that. We keep on electing people who hold themselves out as being able to “solve” these problems…and clearly, aren’t solving them…why do we do this again?

11. People carelessly tossing around the word “Peace.” It is NOT the absence of war. It has to do with the unconditional acceptance of conditions, which are helpful to one side, and unhelpful to another. The communists used this trick. It’s probably the most effective thing they ever did. In this sense, if none other, they are still among us.

12. That illegal immigration is the one crime which a great number of high-profile candidates for high office, are willing to treat as something other than a crime. It is the Number One crime that enjoys this kind of protection…with smoking pot being a close second. Enough already, they’re CRIMINALS. They are people who have broken one law, most of whom would have no compunctions whatsoever about breaking a second! If you can’t protect women from being killed by illegal aliens, and little girls from being raped by illegal aliens, and teenagers from being murdered and chopped up into pieces by illegal aliens — then don’t run for anything. What’s so hard about this?

13. That people with personal problems with the death penalty, can serve in judicial capacities on courts having jurisdiction over sovereign states that allow the death penalty. This is like allowing vegetarians to run steakhouses.

14. Gluttonous quantities of WAGTOCPAN, which you can find around here much more easily than you might think.

15. That the English language should be controversial. Some people even call it “racist,” thereby all-but-proving Thing I Know #212. To which I have to ask one of my favorite questions — what color is English??

16. That the United States having a border that actually counts for something, is controversial.

17. That the understanding of our planet as a living, dynamic ecosystem, with a temperature and climate pattern that varies with the passage of time as any reasonable mind would expect it to, is some potent argument for liberal politicians to be elected to office. Yes of course the climactic metrics change over time, the planet is a LIVING THING you dimwits. If it was static to the precision of a hundredth of a degree over the course of a hundred years, that would mean everything on it was DEAD. That’s clearly not the case, so what is it that surprises you so much?

18. While we’re on that subject…it makes me barf when I see people defining their identities according to the activity of lecturing their fellow citizens about “carbon footprints,” while running around in vehicles that are quite LARGE. I think your “global warming” thing is a great big crock. My car gets 36 miles a gallon. What the hell are YOU driving, Mister Al Gore Inconvenient Truth Ford Explorer Eight Miles a Gallon Guy? Go pound sand, you pretentious assholes.

19. Shopper-in-training carts. When I go shopping for food, I’m already not having a good time. I don’t need some eight-year-old ramming a miniature plastic shopping cart up my ass when I’m looking for the beer.

20. Bush-bashing liberal conspiracy theorists who accuse our President of the worst, being allowed to make issues out of things that any reasonable person would declare to be trivial to the point of being comical. Supposedly he’s a complete retard who can’t even string together a complete sentence because he’s such a dimwit — but he fooled everybody by crashing planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and then blowing up the levees in New Orleans, and then that bridge in Minneapolis, all without anybody really suspecting anything about his involvement because he’s such an Evil Genius even though he’s a complete idiot. And then he fooled us all into thinking Iraq had weapons of mass destruction even while the experts were saying Iraq didn’t have them…got 3600 coalition members killed, in addition to “hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.” And to fix this, we should…um…raise the minimum wage a buck and a half? Roll back tax cuts? What a load. A lot of people fall for it, all the time…and this makes me want to barf.

Next Intrusion

Thursday, August 30th, 2007

The next regulatory intrusion into the private lives of generally-responsible citizens, should inconvenience — absolutely nobody except — women with dogs. That needs to be the very next thing, and we should all insist on it. Leave the people chugging down on saturated fat products alone, leave the people in enormous cars alone, leave the actors smoking cigarettes in movies alone.

Just…women who own dogs. Disrupt them next, and until then, disrupt absolutely nobody else. It is their TURN.

All the ingredients are there. They’re all-freakin’-over the place, for one thing. It’s become a form of pollution. And that’s a legitimate reason to regulate things, isn’t it? Enough people start doing something, before you know it there are pain-in-the-ass rules in place that wouldn’t be there if fewer people did it…that’s become an American tradition, and I see no reason why dog-owning women should be exempt from this.

It’s a public health problem because women don’t curb their pets. Yes, that’s a crass and reckless generalization. And that’s fine. Regulation is made of crass, reckless generalizations — that’s what regulation is. They are far less likely to curb their dogs than their male counterparts…

…and now they are getting hurt. Bridget O’Keefe lost a finger walking a friend’s dog. The finger cannot be reattached.

She was using [a retractable leash] to walk a friend’s dog, but then, the dog tried to take off.

“I was holding the leash with my right hand, and I think it was just a jerk reaction,” O’Keefe said. “I reached with my left hand to try and stop her.”

She was holding the nylon piece of string inside the leash.

“When I reached for it, I think it retracted back in,” O’Keefe said.

O’Keefe then felt a sharp pain and looked down in shock.

“My finger was gone,” O’Keefe said. “It was pulsing, spurting blood. I know that sounds horrible.”

Surprisingly, though, this isn’t the only horror story.

“My shock was that this isn’t the only case that this has happened,” O’Keefe said.

News 4 WOAI has learned that some people have even lost eyes, and have been severely burned by these types of leashes. Dozens of cases have been cited on the internet, and now O’Keefe is no longer using her retractable leash.

That’s the last straw. Don’t you dare tell me I can’t go to a Hooter’s restaurant, or buy beer on a Sunday, until we have enough rules for dog-owning-women that you could crumple them in a wad and choke a horse. You can start with When I Start Running This Place #8 and, if & when technology permits, When I Start Running This Place #32.

Yes, it’s not Bridget’s dog. That’s not the point. The point is, in all other aspects of life, when a “critical mass” of people all start doing the same thing and then some of them get hurt doing it…that’s all it takes. Rules pop up like dandelions on Easter Sunday after a good morning rain. Half of them, if not moreso, stupid. The woman-and-dog thing shouldn’t be exempt.

It’s troublesome, because dogs are capable of recognizing one, and only one, master. If that happens to be a woman and she’s a pushover, it’s misery for everybody else. Now, in 2007, Al Gore wants us to have a carbon footprint of zero — so the rest of us are struggling against “leashes” plenty short enough, in all other aspects of life. It’s well past time to reign this one in.

Just be careful doing it, don’t burn or cut yourself.

Just An Observation III

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007

There seem to be an awful lot of young people who believe in global warming.

I should qualify that. By “believe in global warming,” what I mean is:

1. Believe that there is such a thing as a meaningful, measurable global temperature;
2. Believe that such a metric ought, properly, to stay more-or-less static;
3. Believe that it is sailing off the charts in the moment that I type this;
4. Believe that the skyrocketing global temperature spells some kind of doom;
5. Believe that the human race is mostly, almost completely, or completely responsible;
6. Believe that the global temperature change is on such apocalyptic levels, that we are now teetering on the edge of the point of no return.

And that things would be so much better if Al Gore won Florida, and the White House, in 2000.

A lot of folks think all this stuff, but a whole lot of the under-thirty crowd thinks all this stuff. I’ve gathered the impression, which I can’t verify easily that a bare majority of people-of-all-ages think all this stuff…but if you count only the folks 30-and-below, the percentage ratchets up to somewhere in the eighties or nineties.

Well. It’s a little bit difficult to know what a snail darter is when you haven’t yet blown out thirty candles, huh? Maybe that’s the problem. Maybe we need to come up with a new term…something like “Snail Darter Politics.”

Phrases are wonderful things. They aren’t like words. If you use a word, and nobody knows what the word means, that’s your fault even if the word can be found in the dictionary. Believe me, I know. Phrases are magical…if you use a phrase, and someone doesn’t know what it means, the onus is on them to go look it up. When you think about it, in a rational world that’s the way it would work with everything. You’re ignorant of something — that’s your problem. Go fix your ignorance and quit bothering people.

Snail darter politics. I like it. That’s exactly what global warming is…snail darter politics.

Three Point Five

Tuesday, August 28th, 2007

I think I’m gonna be sick.

This has mushroomed throughout Monday into one of those “Everyone else is linking it, I might as well do it too” things. Which isn’t sufficient to put it on my radar by itself, and at any rate my attitude was “aw, cut her a break, she’s a teenager and she had to think on her feet.” Butterflies in the tummy and all that.

Well, screw that. The 3.5 GPA, for those who may not know, is on a scale of four. You can tell by the way the young lady draws out the word “beleeeeeve,” that over the years she’s been given mad props for so opining, which is fairly typical for attractive young women. The tendency is for attractive young people, females especially, to be given the same credit for articulating their opinions that less desirable social creatures would be given for researching and validating hard fact.

Which, of course, I’m in no position to do at the moment. I don’t know this is her history for sure. But in life, there are some things that may be presumed because most of the signs are there. And in this case, ALL of the signs are there. She’s an idiot who’s been given a free pass, and then some, because she’s gorgeous. Gorgeous, with a knockout body, blond hair, white skin, straight teeth. Her artificially sky-high grade-point is a disservice to her schools, to everybody else, and to herself especially.

Update: Heh…you’ve just gotta see this.

Best Sentence XVI

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

Hemp FestThe Best Sentence I’ve Read Lately Award today goes to Vexorg, a commenter on Gerard Van der Leun’s website, American Digest. Thanks to blogger friend Buck, we found out about Gerard’s romp through our old stomping grounds of Seattle, where he was able to capture an impressive photo album of the hippie exhibit Hempfest 2007 shindig.

Guitars, old moldy clothes, moccasins, knit caps, tattoos, metal piercings, more metal piercings, and more metal piercings. Old glory days, old Woodstock veterans, and newer enthusiasts trying to repeat an exercise that predated them.

It’s the “sweet sixteen” Hempfest down by the sound in ye olde Seattle. Yes, sixteen years of celebrating reduced cerebration busts loose in Myrtle Edwards Park; a slim strip of grass, driftwood, and a breakwater bracketed by genetic research institutes and the world’s worst modern sculpture park.

It’s a strange celebration and not only because the thousands attending are strange by birth, design and recent inhalation, but because the drug it celebrates is officially not in attendance. It’s like an Oktoberfest without the beer.
:
…to judge by the furtive deals going on down by the breakwater, the “Drug Free” zone is an illusion. The drugs here are anything but free. Ditto the burritos, bongs, and hemp brownies. Other than that, the crowd — running to type and overwhelming predictability — underscores the last line. No matter what else may be going on, This is not a free zone. It’s a zone bounded by ritual and tedium.

I no longer remember, if I ever did, exactly what we had in mind at the San Francisco Acid Tests or the Human Be-In, but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t anything as obvious as all this. We were, I believe, trying to “change the world,” not sell it a hemp t-shirt.
:
The other theme that knits this bizarre replication of the middle ages together is the overwhelming presence of “artisan handcrafts” in the form of the hand-blown glass bong. Somewhere, probably in an obscure province of China, whole villages are dedicated to blowing molten glass and shaping them into these items. And all along the waterfront here today endless vendors are displaying them in all shapes and sizes.

Now you might think that everyone attending Hempfest already has their own personal bong, but evidently that’s not the case. There’s a brisk business going on. There’s also a lot of testing of the new bongs on the side as the local police wisely decide to wander only intermittently through the crowd.

And on the seventh comment, along comes our champion with a one-liner that easily snags the Best Sentence award.

This is the type of religion you end up with when you think you don’t have one.

Mutilation for Vanity

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

It could be worthwhile to follow North Denver News for awhile. There is an editor there, maybe more than one, who shares some of my favorite pet peeves. But the satire there might be a little bit too good.

Thomas Martel, 28, of Bonnie Brae is a big guy. So he has a hard time using the features on ever-shrinking user interfaces on devices like his new iPhone. At least, he did, until he had his thumbs surgically altered in a revolutionary new surgical technique known as “whittling.”

“From my old Treo, to my Blackberry, to this new iPhone, I had a hard time hitting the right buttons, and I always lost those little styluses,” explains Martel. “Sure, the procedure was expensive, but when I think of all the time I save by being able to use modern handhelds so much faster, I really think the surgery will pay for itself in ten to fifteen years. And what it’s saving me in frustration – that’s priceless.”…While Martel’s new thumbs now appear small and effeminate in comparison to his otherwise very large hands, he says he can still lift “pretty much anything I could lift before the surgery – though opening spaghetti sauce jars has been a problem. That was a big surprise.”

Three days later, the editor had to drop a note because too many people didn’t pick up on the humor. This is a good thing, because it involved taking a complete inventory of the >points being made by the original piece — of which there were more than one:

…that U.S. society accepts plastic surgery and decorative deformation of the human body for vanity, but not other reasons; that technology has become a new cult phenomena, in which items are praised or ridiculed based upon tribal allegiances instead of functionality and performance; and we like to pretend that some of our writers have a sense of humor.
:
Additionally, many commentators have derided Mr. Martel for stupidity first and foremost, which may indicate something about their credulity. In an era when fake news, like Paris Hilton, has crowded out real news and public debate, the lesson is that skeptical consumption of information, whether from the North Denver News, the New York Times, or the National Review, is a must.

I appreciate that first point the most because it’s the most subtle. This queasy feeling we have about people mutilating their bodies to better interface with technology is understandable: Is it not the nature of technology to be changing all of the time? How long will this bodily mutilation, which one presumes will be carried to the grave, deliver on the expected benefits?

And yet when the conversation shifts to even more excessive bodily alteration for social ingratiation and no higher purpose, the horror subsides instantly. In fact, it seems the hottest trends in alteration have to do with alterations that are most permanent, to accommodate the fashions that are the most fickle. A navel piercing is “in”; a tattoo is more “in” than that; an enormous tattoo, shoulder to shoulder, that couldn’t possibly be removed without grafting and invasive surgery on the level of what you’d receive after surviving a gasoline fire, is more “in” than that. But a fictional character modifies his thumbs in order to more efficiently perform useful work on a Treo or a Blackberry, and he is excoriated as an idiot.

Explanation? It’s quite simple, really: We’re bored.

Nifong’s Disbarment Unfair

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Mike Nifong says his treatment was unfair.

When former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong mailed in his law license last week, he also included a note bemoaning “the fundamental unfairness” of the North Carolina State Bar’s handling of his ethics case.

Nifong was disbarred for his handling of rape charges against three Duke University men’s lacrosse players. State prosecutors later dismissed the charges and declared the players innocent.

In the Aug. 7 letter, Nifong complained about a revision the State Bar issued to its written ruling, which had omitted one of the counts included in an oral ruling.

Robert Mosteller, a Duke law professor, noticed the missing count.

“Am I just missing this reference, is there an explanation, or just an apparent oversight?” he wrote in an e-mail to the State Bar.

The count was added in an amended order by F. Lane Williamson, a Charlotte lawyer who headed the disciplinary panel.

“Mr. Williamson’s e-mail assertion that the addition of a new conclusion of law based on the request of a Duke University law professor is merely a ‘clerical correction’ is preposterous beyond belief, and is further evidence of the fundamental unfairness with which this entire procedure has been conducted,” Nifong wrote.

Aw…

I am not a big fan of this guy. The beef with him that culminated in his disbarment, had everything to do with “fundamental unfairness” so it speaks poorly of his mental acumen that he’d see fit to toss that phrase into his sniveling protest. Did he intend the irony, or is he completely unaware of it?

If I personally had a hand in punishing Nifong, and was nursing some doubts about whether I’d done the right thing for whatever reason, this latest event would purge those doubts straight-away. Nifong doesn’t seem to think he did anything wrong. If that’s not the case, he is narcissistic beyond belief.

Methusaleh Fad

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Via Rick, we find out that Rachel saw a thug.

Even though nobody reads this blog, the nobodies who do, are well-acquainted with my attitude about droopy trousers. In a way, I’m grateful that they’re here because they help to clarify what goes on when people think in groups. The question that would remain unsettled, if not for them, goes something like this: When you make a decision as part of a large group, are you simply less likely to reach a rational conclusion? Or could it be that you are predisposed to arrive at conclusions that are irrational?

Baggy pantsThe baggy pants fad, and fashion in general, help to answer this. If group-think simply had a disorienting effect on us, depriving us of the attraction that we have toward logical ideas when doing our thinking in solitude, the “bad fads” would have about the same lifespan as the good ones. Baggy pants is an objectively bad fashion; its irrationality is measurable, and not a matter of personal opinion. Boys who insist on wearing their baggy pantaloons every day, interrogated by outraged parents, defend the practice because “the girls like it.” That is probably the most durable test we can construct for bad ideas — someone’s offered an opportunity to defend them, and their defense is going to be to punt to someone else.

Plus, you can’t run in the damn things. If there are activities to be associated with fashion items, the activities associated with this one all seem to be illegal. Well, I just think when you break the law, you ought to be wearing something suitable for running.

The lifespan of a healthy dog or cat has been surpassed by the baggy pants fad: about twelve years, give or take a couple years. Quick — name another fashion item that has endured for six. Beehive hairdo? No. Goatee? Not yet. White go go boots? Mutton chop sideburns? The preppy look? Not even close.

If there is to be a Methusaleh fad, a fad lasting longer than any other in modern times, does the the droopy-drawer look even begin to offer qualities that would distinguish it as a reasonable candidate? Well let’s see…it accentuates the male crack. You know, I don’t swing that way, but it seems doubtful to me that even people who are attracted to men, want to see that. It’s impractical. Twenty years ago it was fashionable for girls with huge breasts to be wearing tight sweaters. Good times…well, you can do a lot of things in a tight sweater. You can’t run with baggy pants on. I think you can run better wearing a bag of cement than you can wearing some baggy pants.

As for the message sent with the fashion fad, this has got to be the most disastrous attribute of the “can smuggle a watermelon in my crotch” craze. It is worn by spoiled urban parasitic youth who want to look more masculine than they are. It got started, it would appear, as a calling card among gay men. So let’s say the potential for ambiguity seems to run a little high here.

Good fadIt’s the longest-running fad in modern times. Those teeny bikini bottoms the ladies used to wear on their swimsuits, riding low on the hips…that’s an example of a “good fad” if ever there was one…they looked great. After two or three years some nameless faceless unaccountable invisible fashion emperor in New York, declared enough was enough. “Boy shorts” are now the “in” thing for feminine swimwear. No such moratorium has been declared on these hoodlum-pants that hoodlums wear doing their hoodlum things, right before leading the police on a hoodlum foot chase that they can’t maintain because their hoodlum pants keep falling off their hoodlum butts.

Maybe it’s all a secret plan to foil crime. I dunno. But the evidence is in: When you go along to get along in a large group, you aren’t simply dissuaded from making logical decisions, it seems you’re actually motivated to make illogical ones. There’s one — just one — twelve-year-long fad in modern history, and it has to do with failing to accomplish the sole objective of wearing clothes, presuming there can be only one: getting your damn ass crack concealed and keeping it that way.

On Smashing WD-40 With a Stick

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

Maybe you shouldn’t do that.

I Made a New Word III

Sunday, July 15th, 2007

PHLACE, PHLACING (v.): Pacing while, and possibly as a consequence of, talking on a cell (or cordless) phone.

Evidence arrives to indicate I’m not the only person who’s been noticing it. And getting ticked off by it, when it’s done in large and inconsiderate doses.

I remember once a few weeks ago I was eating lunch that I had ordered, on a lark, “For Here.” Even though I had no companions and no newspaper. Just didn’t feel like carrying it. So while mastachating away, I was gazing out the window and I saw a chubby gentleman monopolize a fifty foot circle. Monopolize it. People really exerting themselves trying to get past him, with great difficulty. Like an enormous clock pendulum: Over here, then over there, then back over here, then back over there.

Something must be done.

It’s number 38 on my list. Now that I think on it, I think this is the fellow who inspired #38.

Time for drastic measures.

Yikes! V

Thursday, July 12th, 2007

It’s from my old stomping grounds.

Ow…ow…ow…

Jenniffer Spencer, who is biologically male and castrated herself using a disposable razor blade in her prison cell, claims the Idaho Department of Correction and its health care providers are violating her constitutional rights and subjecting her to cruel and unusual punishment by failing to diagnose gender identity disorder and treat her with the female hormone estrogen.

It’s the intellectual plague of our times. Truth is diminishing, because you see, everything is negotiable. Absolutely everything.

This Is Good XLI

Saturday, July 7th, 2007

Someone drove a Hummer to a Live Earth concert.

Hummer

I thought this passage was humorous in an ironic sort of way:

The show at Giant Stadium in New Jersey is finally underway. Performers are playing on a stage built of recycled tires. At this point, the tires outnumber the fans in attendance.

Okay, so there aren’t even that many people going to the New Jersey thing. Which raises the question…although I’m sure it’s been raised before…what exactly is this supposed to do? Because if global warming is indeed caused by human activity, putting on a rock concert wouldn’t exactly mitigate the effect would it? There’s all those cars coming in, some of them Hummers…there’s electricity to be churned up, concessions to be sold, people talking and breathing hard and what-not. Rock concerts are just little hotbeds of human activity.

Who’s more hypocritical. The guy who drove the Hummer, or the folks who put on the show in the first place?

As I’ve said before: I make a futile effort at getting rid of my middle-age pudge, on a 24-speed hybrid bike in Northern California. It’s a “blue” part of the country, although others are bluer. It’s a socially trendy region, although others are trendier. And it’s a valley, so we tend to have hefty local concerns about smog and what-not…although other municipalities may have heftier concerns.

But we’re very “hip” around here. We say all the right things. We have “Spare The Air” days, and we look for ways to conserve and recycle and carpool…or at least we’re supposed to…

…and I’m constantly amazed how many places I can ride, and get some not-too-subtle reminder that I’ve ridden into a location where I’m not expected to be riding. You know. No sidewalks, no shoulders…none…garbage cans being left out all days of the week, to the point where you eventually give up trying to figure out what days they’ll be hauled back in, because they never are. Intersections without crosswalks. Oh-so-trendy coffee shops without bike racks anywhere.

If I bike to work, I have to get there early because a building with 200 people in it, has a stairwell where six bikes can be locked up. No more than that. And you guessed it…no bike rack. Bikes don’t have air conditioning, so this time of year, early doesn’t mean “before 8:30” — it means early. Six out of 200, and Number Seven has to leave his bike wherever and take his chances, or go back home.

I live in a place where everybody is supposed to be concerned about the environment.

I live in a place where people are expected to drive wherever they go. Big, BIG cars. To go car shopping, and demand more than 20 miles a gallon, is looked upon as insanity. Cars are supposed to be big.

I live in a place that is freakin’ hypocritical. But it’s nothing special. I drive too…I fly…I travel…I go to other states. And I could be talking about something going on in any one of them. Environment, pollution, emissions, blah blah blah…oh, I’m so concerned. But nobody acts like it. Nobody really does anything. If they do something, it’s got a lot more to do with getting attention than having any beneficial effect on the environment.

I think they should keep having these concerts, but they should call them something else. Truth-in-advertising, ya know. Call them “Let’s pretend to care” concerts or something.

Hey…how many bikes are being locked up at these concerts? I’d really like to know.

Update 7-8-07: I think this is the most overly-simplistic test of individual common sense and critical thinking that there could possibly be. It’s as if some divine Kismet devised some test for us, and smacked us down with it. Suppose, just as a hypothetical, just to take all the emotionalism out of it…suppose there was something else going on with all this blue-blood celebrity hypocrisy.

Suppose instead of polluting, it’s something else we all “know” we’re not supposed to do, but that a lot of us do anyway. Something that’s regarded as neither conservative nor liberal.

Let’s say you’re at the city aquarium, and you’re tapping on the glass to get the fish to move. There. That’s perfect.

You’re tapping on the glass, and as if someone yelled “Go!” all of a sudden you’re being confronted face-to-face by Al Gore, and Laurie David, and Madonna, and Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz. And they’re all getting after you, telling you not to tap on the glass. Scientists are unanimous in their convictions that the fish are getting pissed off, and are about to retaliate against humanity. You’re making it worse by tapping on the glass.

And here’s the funny part. All the time they’re talking to you, they’ve taken off their shoes and as they’re lecturing you, they’re pounding their shoes against the glass they’ve told you not to tap.

And when you get a chance to get a word in edge-wise…well, you don’t of course, but assuming you do…you say the first common-sense thing that comes to your mind. “Hey, thumbdicks, why are you banging your shoes against that glass you told me not to tap?” Because, y’know, if there really is a problem with the fish getting all pissed off over the glass-tapping and getting ready to overthrow humanity, and because of that you’re not supposed to tap on the glass, isn’t it evidence that the Gore/Feinstein/David/Diaz loudmouths doubt their own rhetoric, when they’re banging their shoes against the glass?

So Al Gore explains, patiently, and somewhat condescendingly: We have to bang the glass. It attracts attention from the other humans in proximity, and don’t you know our message is so very, very important.

For emphasis, he bangs his waffle-stomper hiking boot against the glass three more times, bang bang bang.

Now I know that is so very, very ridiculous. But answer me this: How is my utterly ridiculous hypothetical different from the global warming…uh…well, let’s call it what it is. The global warming craze.

It’s not different. We’re told there is a crisis looming, and it’s connected to our everyday activities, therefore we are to cease and desist. We’re told this by all these big stars who, in the middle of the syllables in which they tell us this, do a whole lot more of that very thing they’re telling us to stop doing.

Blogger friend Buck comes up with an article in the UK Daily Mail that shows just how bad this situation has gotten. And yes, all across this globe there are millions, and millions, and millions of people being told to stop tapping the glass, by politicians and Hollywood heavyweights who are banging crowbars and hiking boots and seldgehammers against that very same glass. And they’re listening. Ooh, they’re saying, I’d better stop tapping the glass, and you’d better stop too. But the politicians and celebrities can keep on hammering.

How many different ways can you get the attention of the public, when your message is that important, besides hammering on aquarium glass with a crowbar?

How many different ways can you do it, without a rock concert?

Lest you think a rock concert is “clean” in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, Pajamas Media helps put it in perspective.

So you see, it isn’t any more complicated than that ludicrous aquarium analogy after all. The only meaningful difference, is this: We can preserve our lives, and the quality thereof, without tapping on glass and irritating the damn fish. But we do need to consume power in order to do that. And we can’t keep living without throwing off carbon dioxide…in very modest amounts compared to the Diaz/Gore/Feinstein/Kerry/Paltrow crowd, but we do still need to emit. Methane, which we emit indirectly through our demand for agricultural products, has a much higher greenhouse gas effect than carbon dioxide on a pound-for-pound basis. But we produce carbon dioxide more directly, and through our industrial-sector activity. And what do we do to get this snotty lecturing from the politicos and the jet-set? We consume through our industrial sector…and emit carbon dioxide. Relatively neutral compared to methane in greenhouse gas effect.

Eh. People have attacked industry as long as there’s been industry. It’s us everyday folk who are acting all weird, by buying into this and believing it. It is every bit as silly as feeling guilty over tapping on the aquarium glass, as a result of the lectures being delivered by a man smacking the same glass with…a freakin’ manhole cover. It is as simplistic and as direct of a test of our ability to think critically, as could ever be devised, by man or by deity.

Snookered. We’re being snookered. The snookerers aren’t even doing that good of a job of it. But so far, it’s an effective job.

WAGTOCPAN Will Destroy Us

Monday, March 12th, 2007

ManBearPigThis weekend I decided my answer to ManBearPig is WAGTOCPAN.

The woman and I drove up to the boy’s mom’s place, and dropped off the boy. Then we went on a shopping excursion which would be concluded in the evening at Wal Mart. In Folsom. On a weekend. And while I’m wondering, how is it I continue to be talked into this, I’m seeing WAGTOCPAN everywhere. There’s more of it than there was a week ago, more of it last week than there was a year ago. It’s got a chokehold on us, WAGTOCPAN does, and it’s going to eventually destroy us all.

I’m talking about Women And Girls Talking On Cell Phones About Nothing.

How is it any skin off my nose? Because WAGTOCPAN is freakin’ everywhere. The whole does more damage than the sum of it’s parts. It’s a form of pollution. There’s a kind of exponential or second-degree curvature to the damage they do; put more simply, it seems to take four times as long to cut through a crowd with twenty WAGTOCPAN, as it is to transcend a crowd with only ten WAGTOCPAN. Rudeness decides the Darwinism; the right-of-way goes to whoever seizes it, and the tendency is for the seizure to be done by whoever is female, and engaged in an electronic conversation elsewhere.

How do I know they’re talking About Nothing? I can see it in their eyes. People have a certain look on the face when they are saying, or listening to, important things. These girls aren’t showing it. They just aren’t. And then there’s the quantity. Quantity, you know, eventually defeats quality. It has to. I see five randomly-selected women in Wal-Mart, three of them are going to be gabbing away on a cell phone. With that glassy “not very important” look in their eyes. Five years ago, it would have been one outta five. Ten years ago, it would have been one outta twenty. Now…it’s a majority. And of course, if we had been shopping on Saturday, about ten to noon or thereabouts, it would have been more than that.

What the hell are all these women talking about? Are they a bunch of Jack Bauers, each one of them helping to interrogate a terrorist or defuse a bomb?

I’m just not buying it. They’re talking about crap. And you know, that’s just fine with me. To each their own, libertarian leanings and all. Except, there is that pollution factor. Walking through Folsom, or driving through Folsom, or doing-whatever through Folsom…lately, on a weekend, it’s like swimming through a hive of angry bees. Everywhere you look, WAGTOCPAN — blah, blah blah. In enormous gleaming metal vehicles. Looking where they’re going? Really?

They don’t appear to be. And they’re in command of awesomely heavy and hard objects on wheels.

And here’s something else to think about, something that leads me to believe it’s all about nothing. We’re in Folsom…land of gadgets. People just love to buy gadgets here, from the latest Lexus to the latest iPod accessory to the latest — you name it. Everyone wants to prove they have arrived. Folsom, where the price of your iced-coffee drink is drawn in large neat numbers on the dome of your plastic cup, so everyone can admire that you paid $4.75 for it. Folsom, the valley of “I’m Not Spoiled, Just Loved” bumper stickers.

A hands-free device costs between ten and fifteen clams. Mine was fifty, because it’s a bluetooth model; you can get it now, for half that much. But you don’t need bluetooth.

How come Folsom, land of the six-bedroom houses and jewel-encrusted cell phones, is flooded with so many women holding the appliances up to their ears? If it’s a serious conversation and they have to have it all the time, wouldn’t they eventually adapt to having it?

You know how scary it is to pass a woman in a big truck, on the left, when she’s holding a cell phone up to her left ear? And supposed to be paying attention to what’s going on?

WAGTOCPANAl Gore wants us to measure our “carbon footprints” and based on the size of same, feel guilty. Or buy something. Or both. (I think mine was 6.75 or thereabouts.) Seems to me it’s an idea right for other walks of life…like WAGTOCPAN. Oh, how I’d love to see an article appearing in a glossy magazine somewhere containing the words “According to experts, there are several things the average person can do to bring her WAGTOCPAN under control…”

I should hasten to add something. In all my years on the planet, I’ve seldom seen women-and-girls pick up a bad habit that wasn’t started by the guys first, and I doubt this is any exception. And I happen to know MABTOCPAN is indeed a problem. I’ve seen it happen. Furthermore…guys, it seems, are on balance far less decisive about what speed they want to drive, when they chatter on their cell phones. They chew someone out, they go faster, someone else chews them out, they want to slow down. But if I were to do a count of how many people are chattering away on their cell phones when they should be watching where they’re going — this is a female thing. I know the men are equally guilty, it’s just harder to catch them in the act because their conversations are shorter.

This is another reason I know the conversations are meaningless. Men and women have different habits with their social customs, but not with how they send and receive important messages. This has little to do with important messages; it’s a social custom. I’m serial. Super-duper-serial.

I just wish people, regardless of whether they wear skirts or trousers, would watch where they’re going when they engage in it. Now excuse me, I have to take this…

Update: As far as MABTOCPAN goes, here’s an example that borders on the surreal…

Timothy Michael Seibert was in the midst of raping a 49-year-old woman, according to police, when he answered a cell phone call from his wife.

The woman was so close to the phone she could hear Seibert’s wife yelling at him, asking him where he was and what he was doing, according to arrest documents filed by Silver Spring Twp. police.

See, gender doesn’t have a whole lot to do with it. The cell phone thing, in general…it’s just gotten way, way outta hand. “Hey, whaddya doin’?” “I’m watching a movie, this dude sitting next to me is getting really pissed about my cell phone.” “Yeah? Cool.” “What are YOU doing?” “I’m mugging some guy, getting ready to steal his car.” “Hey, cool.”

Cell phone calls of the “What Are You Doing” variety, have got to be the plague of our times. People who take such calls, have got to be on the most shallow end of the gene pool. Raping women is worse, of course. But taking a cell phone call about what you’re doing, and making a conversation out of it, is a crime in itself.

Cemetary Piddling

Tuesday, March 6th, 2007

Is it unfair of me to read something in to this?

A television photographer who was fired for urinating in a cemetery while covering the funeral of an Iowa soldier was denied unemployment benefits. Gerry Edwards, of Center Point, was dismissed in December by KGAN-TV in Cedar Rapids.

In November, Edwards urinated near a monument at a cemetery while he was there covering the funeral procession for 23-year-old Sgt. James Musack, of Riverside, who was killed in Iraq, court records said.

Another journalist photographed the incident, and it was e-mailed to Edwards’ managers. Records said officials escorted Edwards out of the building within hours and gave him a choice of resigning or being fired.

I think the most accurate answer I can give to that question is: Kinda. A little. But not completely.

I see the tombstone piddling as metaphorical. I see it as a microcausm of everything our Fourth Estate, and our angry anti-war leftists, have been doing for the last four years. They whip out their cameras, point at the three-thousand-plus casualties and damn George Bush to hell for sending our brave soldiers in to harm’s way. And then after the cameras have shut down, they piss on tombstones. The whole lot of ’em. Gerry Edwards, and his antagonistic colleague who took this action to end Edwards’ career, acted out this little conflict in the middle of a solemn ceremony. They were dispatched to that ceremony to arouse the passions of the rest of us. Passions borne of decency. Decency which neither one of them reflect.

Isolated incident? Perhaps. But why am I to think so? Really?

Gerry Edwards disgusts us not because of the vile fluid that came out of his body, but because of his willingness to dispense it in such a hallowed place. I think there’s nothing unique about him. I think he’s just the guy who couldn’t hold it any longer…and got caught.

Trackposted to Bullwinkle Blog

Cancel The Account

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

Okay everybody else is posting this, I might as well too. You really should listen to this from beginning to end. We’ve all been here in some way or another, right?

Yikes! III

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

What an ass-and-a-half. Didn’t stop.

It would be very hard to fake this, too…

Wii Will Kill Us All?

Tuesday, December 26th, 2006

LeahMaybe I’ve been a little too tough on the newfangled video games. Some of these pictures taken with Nintendo’s Wii look pretty good (some sissies would say this is NSFW, although I don’t see how; you’ve been warned).

But Will Payne of the Harvard Crimson remains a skeptic. His article diligently warns us against our upcoming fate, that “it’s only a matter of time before someone pokes a friend’s eye out with a renegade Wiimote. On the popular gaming message board 1up.com, poster Shadowfamicom warns ominously that ‘the Wii will kill us all.'”

Heh…it’s good to know we’re destined to survive global warming after all.

Christmas 2006

Monday, December 25th, 2006

Thanks to Trip at Webloggin, and Miss Cellania for the nice Christmas cards.

My nine-year-old was the oldest one in line at the mall to see Santa Claus. We were actually there to have a nice lunch together, and we didn’t know Santa would be stopping by. We became aware of it when one of the younger toe-heads was done with telling Santa what he wanted…except…he didn’t think he was done. Jeebus, you talk about LOUD. You’d think someone was pouring boiling water all over his bare ass, you know?

So the dad tries to calm the kid down by hauling him off somewhere and letting him cry it out. Where all parents take their bratty kids in situations like that. Close to ME.

And the kid’s just yammering away. Yammering, yammering…like this…

Dad decides to try a different tack. No, not the one I would have done. He hauls the little shit back in to see Santa again! And we can hear the kid in there, screaming in poor Santa’s ear. One minute turns into two…two minutes turn into three…it goes on and on and on. And I’m thinking, hmm, there’s a career choice I need to remember to pass up even if it means living in a cardboard box.

NaughtyAnd so, on a lark we decided to see Santa.

Now, Santa’s little helper has a nice digital camera, and they’re charging five bones a pop for a picture of your kid with Santa. One problem: The card is downloading or something…so there’s a delay. So my son gets a little extra time to tell Santa about all the crap he wants. Blah, blah, blah. Well he gets to the end of the list…card is still downloading.

Santa needs to stall for time. So he asks the boy if he’s been nice all year. My son says absolutely yes. And Santa smells some bullshit, because y’know, he’s Santa…and there is some…anyway, that’s what I think. So the grilling continues, and they start to have a conversation about how much niceness you need to get your list taken care of, and what some naughtiness does to it. And how you should always tell the truth to Santa, because he knows anyway.

So he’s got my son on his lap and he’s reminding him it’s okay if he had a little tiny spell of naughtiness sometime this year. Because that’s all right, you know…happens to everyone.

My son looks right up at him, steals a glance at me, looks back at Santa…and he says, so that all the parents and kids in line behind me can hear every syllable…”Well — my Dad’s been naughty.” Of course I could feel my ears burning as the crowd roared with laughter.

Way to throw the ol’ man under the bus, kid.

So that’s how mine went. Hope yours was merry too.

Update: Here’s to best wishes for what remains of ’06, and for the New Year and many months thereafter. Hope the best of dreams of everyone reading this, and of everyone who never will, are realized in full and may the wind blow gently at the backs of all humanity…except for the stupid bitch who took trotted her sick kids around and gave my girlfriend the flu. Her temperature is about 101.5 and it’s a lotta fun. Oh well, we had good Christmas in spite of it. I think the squeeze was a little depressed that her physical strength just flat-ass gave out in the middle of the gift exchange, and she had to go to bed ’cause she couldn’t keep her eyes open any longer. And I’m the one who got coal in his stocking, huh. Someone’s out there spreading a virus because she can’t do her Christmas shopping when the hubby or boyfriend could watch the kids…or doesn’t want to bother with getting a sitter…or is simply inconsiderate. And I’m the one who gets coal. Santa, your lists need some work.

Update: And an extra helping of Christmas itching powder down the underpants of all the snotty atheists who think they’re so much smarter than everybody else, spurred by their sense of right-and-wrong to leap into action when “IN GOD WE TRUST” is found on our money, or when bus drivers wear Santa hats. — BUT — won’t get off their conceited atheist asses to keep a single McDonald’s open on Christmas Day so I can get my kid a happy meal. Isn’t it funny? There is a principle at stake in keeping church & state separate, always, until such a fracas might possibly have a side-benefit of convenience for the rest of us…like having mail delivered on December 25th for example. And then, they’re nowhere to be found. Politically active only when they’re being a pain in the ass. Atheists make me sick. Show me ten atheists, I’ll bet I can show you at least nine assholes who put out a Christmas stocking — and probably eight who screamed and yelled like a red-headed stepchild when they didn’t get what they wanted. Coal for ME, Santa? Why? Why are we putting up with the atheists at all? EVERYBODY ELSE…Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

Update: And whoever drew up the plans for my son’s toy. An air-pressure powered styrofoam rocket that’s supposed to go 120 feet in the air. Kinda blips up somewhere between eight and ten INCHES, if that. Hey thanks guys! Well, we got to spend some time together exploring trails, kinda doing guy stuff as father and son. Good Christmas all in all. Would have been even better with a rocket that did what it was SUPPOSED to do. Screw you guys. You’re ripping of little kids on Christmas, charging good money for toys that don’t work. And I get coal. Everybody ELSE, I wish a joyous holiday season and the upcoming year brings you everything you want, and none of the things you don’t.

Woman Dies After Being Hit By Three Cars

Saturday, December 23rd, 2006

What’s going on in my old stomping grounds of Kirkland? This happened right at the mid-point of my old commute on I-405.

Kaisa Lauren Larson…had been asked to leave the bar by tavern employees earlier in the evening but was hanging out in the parking lot. She “was very intoxicated” and was “getting in the way” as officers attempted to investigate the assault complaint, Rudeen said. Officers called Larson a cab that was to take her to a friend’s house in Lynnwood.

As the cab traveled north on I-405, Larson became agitated and the cab driver pulled over on the shoulder in an attempt to calm her down, Rudeen said. Larson, who was wearing dark clothing, jumped out of the cab and began walking across northbound lanes. She made it halfway to the median when she was struck by a car and fell to the ground about 1:35 a.m., Rudeen said. She was then hit by two other cars and died at the scene.

Ba-bump, ba-bump, smoosh. That’s always been one of my phobias, having a drunk in dark clothing run out in front of me at one in the morning. Kinda freaky reading about it actually happening, right where I used to live.

Whiskey…Tango…Foxtrot… X

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

Head Up AssWhat do commentators at The Daily Kos do for a living? I mean, these aren’t people making real decisions, are they? Are they? Like, who gets promoted, who has to make photocopies until he quits, how much Nutra-Sweet to pump into a big vat of cola syrup, whether this-or-that pipeline of sewage has already been treated or not.

Not sure what the scientific term is for what we’re seeing here. It’s not idiocy, quite so much as a frighteningly deficient cognitive ability, maybe brewed in with a narcissistic need for attention and perhaps a dash of psychological projection. Thanks to Trip at Webloggin, we come to learn that the results sometimes are…well, take a look.

While some people are rightly concerned for Senator Tim Johnson’s health there are many on the left who are more concerned with maintaining that slim majority – so much so that they have veered down the predictable path of conspiracies behind the “sudden illness”.

well, ok, I will say it – (4+ / 1-)

my, how convenient for the repubs, just like wellstone’s plane crash.

you know what I am hinting at here…

I never take these sorts of things at mere face value; the stakes are just too high.

bush and cheney are criminals; just like desperate cornered mafiosi, bush and cheney will do anything to protect themselves, and I do mean anything.

yeah, I think that wellstone was murdered.

The one entry I cited is just the tip of the donkey’s tail. Go have a look at the rest. I’ll wait.

Now admittedly, I don’t know for a fact that these people somehow got dressed in the morning and started walking around outside. Maybe not. But I know from experience, that DailyKOS does not clean up grammar/punctuation/spelling, so these writers are able to put together sentences that make some sense…even if the ideas hanging from those sentences, do not.

How do you do that, or anything else, while you’re looking at life this way?

Pull My Finger, Ground This Flight

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

What a pain in the ass. Sorry, no pun intended.

The Dallas-bound [American Airlines] flight was diverted to Nashville after several passengers reported smelling burning sulfur…All 99 passengers and five crew members were taken off and screened while the plane was searched and luggage was screened [Monday].

The FBI questioned a passenger who admitted she struck the matches in an attempt to conceal a “body odor,” Lowrance said. She had an unspecified medical condition, authorities said.
:
The flight took off again, but the woman was not allowed back on the plane. The woman, who was not identified, was not charged in the incident.

Read the whole thing