House of Eratosthenes

You never wrestle with a pig, because you both get dirty and the pig likes it. It’s good advice that has endured throughout the ages. I have always appreciated it (although some among those who’ve known me the longest, may call this into question). It’s a reminder that we are not all the same, we’re not all living life for the same purpose, we’re not all getting the same things out of it — and, also, that there isn’t anyone among us who genuinely “loves to argue politics.” Nobody fits into that; not a single soul.

Half of us see an opportunity to figure out what, if anything, lures otherwise mentally capable colleagues into whackjob bullshit opinions. The other half of us see an opportunity to pursue an ancient dream to re-make the entire world into carbon copies of themselves. And, of course, the other half of us would much rather talk about what’s for dinner tomorrow night, who’s getting kicked off American Idol, and whether it’s a good idea to put on a jacket before leaving the house.

And all three of these halves must acknowledge there’s at least a possibility that the entire thing is a waste of time. We all see the wisdom in the timeless dictum about wrestling with the pig.

But those of us in the first half are occasionally confronted with a conundrum: What if it isn’t a pig? What if it is something even lower? What if it’s a mollusk? Something that doesn’t like or dislike mud, but simply lives out its existence in it as a simple fact of life? There can be value in studying these creatures. No pride, certainly. But edification.

Particularly with regard to how many of the mollusks there are, and how quickly they’re breeding. It might tell you there’s a storm coming.

And so I’m not proud of lowering myself to picking through the mollusks over here; but the page belongs to somebody I consider to be a blogger friend. Although his gadflies have made it clear what they think of me. In fact, they have very little else to say, which is why I call them mollusks.

Arguing, arguing, arguing, not a single observation made, not a single conclusion offered about a goddamn thing. It all spirals back inward to the tired old left-winger black hole of “I’m a good person and you’re not.” A theatrical gallop out the door with a hefty slamming of it, followed by more of the same.

The approval of gastropods like these, is the payoff for gerbil-faced men who pretend to like women who despise them? Membership in their little clique, is the payoff for pretending Queen Latifah is just as sexy as Beyonce?

Beer Wench The world in which I’m allowed to audibly notice the beauty of ravishing women, may shrivel down into the size of a tennis court by noon tomorrow. If so, that’s my world. Women work pretty hard to make themselves up so we appreciate them, and I intend to notice it. Bonus points for ’em if they bring me cold beer and hot wings.

Whoever’s upset about that can get just as snippy with me as they want.

With regard to the conversation itself, how it went, and what it tells me about what is going on with our country and the discourse in it, I can only say this:

My wrestling match with the mollusks was a successful one. If I were swimming around in the muck with iconoclasts, it would have been a waste of time. But these were not rugged individuals, they were commoners. That is the objective. When you define right and wrong according to whether a consensus of your peers does or does not allow something into your little collectivist perimeter, then by definition you become a bandwagoneer, one who defines good versus evil according to whether someone is already doing the same thing, and how many of them there are.

The conversation tells me something useful. And what it tells me is alarming.

This is the reason why political dialogue is so damn contentious. Right here. This is why you can lose your job if you discuss politics at work. Our left-wingers are doing it to us.

They skip right past the reasoned, logical, tried-and-true “Tell Me Why It Is You Think That” exchange of ideas — and lunge, like a jackal after a jugular, into the only part of the argument they are capable of understanding:

You think this, I think that.

I’m wonderful.

You’re mean, you’re bigoted, you’re intolerant, you’re dumb, you’re unsophisticated — you’re substandard.

You are to be shunned, and whoever does not shun you shall be shunned. You are to be ostracized, and anyone who doesn’t ostracize the likes of you brings discredit upon himself…

…and that includes our employer.

It’s something straight out of the union headquarters. On paper, they’re constructing a perfect world in which nobody ever fucks with anybody else’s livelihood. But in reality, fucking with people’s livelihood is what it’s all about. “Nice marital status/community stature/career/job ya got there; be a shame if something happened to it.”

That’s the problem with joining a crusade that is glorious, and not merely good. Your conscience becomes an extraneous and useless appendage. Then it becomes a casualty. Your capacity to think as an individual, runs pretty much the same course. Those two prospects, to me, are plenty hideous enough.

But I’m required to pretend wretched ugly women are good-looking, and genuinely good-looking women are no different?

This horrifies me. Think of the repercussions — they are there, whether the mollusks foresee them or not. If one woman cannot be more physically appealing than another, then nothing can be superior to anything else. Not anywhere. Without pretty women, there can be no sweet-smelling fresh air, no delicious food, no awe-inspiring music, no inspiring ideas. Ultimately, all movies must be Zardoz, scores cannot be maintained in any game, all meat must be tofu, all beer must be flat and you can’t have dessert after your dinner. No variety to anything anywhere. The supreme is bludgeoned down into a common layer, gossamer-thin, with the mediocre. It brings to mind what I was bitching about over here — only our superstar politicians are allowed excellence, the job of the rest of us is to emulate each other and stick to the baseline like a snail on the ground.

What a pathetic fucking two-dimensional world. Let ’em keep it.

Cross-posted at Right Wing News.

This wasn’t a bad post, Morgan, but it rambled a bit. You start off pointing out the disparate differences between conservatives, liberals, and the I-don’t-care’s (three halves, by the way? Hmmm). Then we somehow wandered from that, over to the topic of beautiful women.

I’m really not sure what one has to do with the other. Maybe I’m not at my best today, but I’m having trouble parsing this.
- cylarz | 04/17/2010 @ 23:50
I think this was humorous and brilliant. 🙂
- DarcsFalcon | 04/18/2010 @ 01:30
Cy –

Recommend you follow the link and read all the way through. You’re right, it’s kind of dirty pool on my part structuring it in such a way that this is necessary to understand what I’m talking about. But the bowling lane that is politically correct conversation is becoming so narrow and the gutters so close together, that it seems nowadays it is a sin not only to observe the obvious that democrats are inexplicably drawn toward frumpy ugly women, but also to simply point out “I think this woman is more physically appealing than that one.” As I pointed out in the last paragraph, it’s impossible to take things that far without ending up in some kind of weird Twilight Zone…a pancake world. Although I suspect the zealots don’t realize this, since they didn’t impress me as the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Falcon –

Thanks for the kind words, and welcome.
- mkfreeberg | 04/18/2010 @ 06:18
[…] Protester “Salt and Freshly Ground Black People” “This Is How They Buy You” You Get Dirty, and the Pig Likes It Solar Power at Night “These Are My People: Americans” “We Will Never Say Thank […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 04/18/2010 @ 07:45
[…] Make-Up Rule 5 Get Dirty Twin Whip […]
- Amy Acker presents “The Federal Reserve: Engine of Corruption” | 04/18/2010 @ 13:31
[…] Morgan Freeberg extends the classic wrestling-with-a-pig metaphor down the food chain a bit, all the way to mollusks, and this bit of derision is included: The approval of gastropods like these, is the payoff for gerbil-faced men who pretend to like women who despise them? Membership in their little clique, is the payoff for pretending Queen Latifah is just as sexy as Beyonce? […]
- dustbury.com » How shellfish of me | 04/18/2010 @ 17:23
You’re young enough not to have been aware of the feminist’s last foray in this area. They tried to tell us that merely looking at a woman with interest degraded her, and all other women by extension. This was the latter part of the 80s, and it faded away. I don’t think we need to fear this round, either.
- Gordon | 04/18/2010 @ 19:02

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent

Items of Interest

Monthly Archives

What They Say

Links

You Get Dirty, and the Pig Likes ItSaturday, April 17th, 2010

You Get Dirty, and the Pig Likes It
Saturday, April 17th, 2010