Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
What interests me about this article — other than where in the hell the paragraphs are supposed to begin and end — is that it was not written by a tighty-righty wild-eyed conservative, but rather by someone who seems to be among our modern socialists. By “modern socialist” I mean not quite so much a practicing one, as one who seeks to promote socialism by stigmatizing against anyone calling it what it really is. In fact, much of the verbiage is not quite so much an assertion that Obama will be a one-termer…although he does say that…but a rant against the tea party movement.
Again someone rails against the tea party movement with that tired, dishonest, “Where Were You When Bush Was…” argument.
I continue to be amused and amazed: President Change does things that simply cannot be defended, and yet, to some people, they must be. So in grasping at straws to defend the indefensible, they come up with this gem: Here’s something President Change’s predecessor did, that in some ways, could be regarded as similar to what is being done now. President Change can be defended, after all, because President Change is…consistent. President Change is good, or at least, you are not allowed to say or imply President Change is bad. Because President Change is not changing anything.
Raspy sigh. I saw a protest sign somewhere yesterday that said it best: How can debt be both the problem and the solution?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
How do you figure he will be a one term president.
Based on actions seen to date, I figure we will be well off if he only sticks around for ten terms.
I have seen nothing that suggests a willingness to run candidates what will get the rest of the folk to come out and vote while there is still time to save it.
- Larry Sheldon | 04/16/2009 @ 20:00In the world of fashion, the flame that burns the brightest has to snuff out the quickest.
And Obama burns “Spice Girls” bright. Look around; who’s still yelling triumphantly “yes we did”? Just a few moonbats on the blogs. And that’s just after three months.
- mkfreeberg | 04/16/2009 @ 20:08