Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Hmmm…
A Texas mother of twins got the shock of her life when doctors revealed that her 11-month-old boys do not have the same father.
Mia Washington decided to get some expert advice when she and her partner noticed that twins Justin and Jordan had different facial features.
Paternity tests then revealed what had happened — two eggs had been fertilized by two different sperm and there was a 99.99% chance the twins had different dads. Doctors at the DNA lab in Dallas, Texas had never seen such a result.
Washington later admitted she had had an affair and got pregnant by two different men at the same time.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
So that would make them…Step Twins???
Man, these two are going to have a rough time for the rest of their lives, either that or a good comedy routine…Badda Bing!
- tim | 05/20/2009 @ 08:42I wonder if Dad will treat them with impartiality and equal love.
- Morenuancedthanyou | 05/20/2009 @ 12:34About which: Don’t ask the question if you can’t stand the answer. You gotta believe Mom KNEW, right?
- bpenni | 05/20/2009 @ 13:17“I wonder if Dad will treat them with impartiality and equal love.”
If his a real man yes. Though easy for me to say…
“You gotta believe Mom KNEW, right?”
Oh, I’m sure she got that sick feeling once she recognized the facial differences Buck. Hell, let’s face it she wasn’t sure who the daddy was of the twins.
Father’s Day is gonn’a be interesting around that house and on parent/teachers nights, weddings…
- tim | 05/20/2009 @ 15:35“I wonder if Dad will treat them with impartiality and equal love.”
If his a real man yes. Though easy for me to say…
The love child born from a forbidden union is a rather thorny problem for the feminists who are all set to pounce when they detect greater stigma against the cheating woman than her philandering male counterpart. Unplanned pregnancies do, or at least in a reasonable mind can, justify a differential.
The man of the house cheats, and gets an outsider pregnant — what of it? Worst-case scenario, a judgment, to be followed by a monthly debit from the bank account, perhaps a crippling one. Starting a business carries exactly the same risk.
The woman cheats, and if the contraceptives fail she then places herself in the position of committing paternity fraud; the worst thing that can be done to a man, bar none. The child born from the philandering male, provided his mother is single, stands a decent chance of snagging a stepfather who knows going in exactly what’s in the package deal. Whereas this other child, through no fault of his own, insults his “father’s” bloodline, sexual ego and very household, simply through his existence. Then he has to spend an entire childhood there.
Nope, I don’t think men placed in that position “love” the child like their own, even if they’re real men. Call me a Doubting Thomas on such a love being possible. It’s one of those things the Good Lord designed us not to do, and that’s the reason why. Look at all these civilizations that came to maturity across the centuries, all over the world, without having any contact with each other; see how many of them honor the tradition, in some form or another, of each child having a “given” name and a surname, so they can carry on the name of their fathers.
That’s why women who are capable of falling in love with one-and-only-one man, are the guardians of civilizations. And women who spread their legs for any ol’ joe who comes along, like this one, are the destroyers of such civilizations. Women are the cement, men are the bricks.
- mkfreeberg | 05/20/2009 @ 16:09I think she’s a vile slut.
I feel sorry for her husband and the two boys – what a ugly legacy she’s bequeathed on her family.
- Daphne | 05/23/2009 @ 17:52