Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Another gem at RightNetwork.
Matthews is rightfully skewered.
Watching the near-miraculous rescue of the Chilean miners who had been trapped underground for 69 days, Matthews suddenly declared that if they had followed the Tea Party’s “every man for himself” philosophy, they wouldn’t have gotten out alive…and then trumped himself by declaring that the miners “would have been killing each other after about two days.”
What an ass.
Now that I think about it, the people who told me Hardball is hard-hitting and balanced and presents both sides…were the same ones who told me that about Boston Legal.
Joy-Behar levels of insight, there. You have to wonder how people get dressed and start walking around.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
And he bases this on ….. ?????
“Every man for himself.” Huh. Now, when I was coming back from the Restoring Honor rally in D.C., my wife was coming to pick me up in Indianapolis — halfway home for the rest of the bus riders, so I could go help her move my mother-in-law down here. I got a call from my wife when the bus was about an hour out of Indy … her car had completely broken down.
One young lady on the bus lent me her iPhone so I could look up towing services near Anderson, where my wife’s car had broken down. I called and arranged a tow to get her off the highway.
The buses stopped in Indy, 40 minutes from where my wife’s car had broken down, to let me off and a few others who had gotten on at Indy on the way there.
A man on another bus who didn’t know me from Adam, had never met me in his life (I didn’t meet all 224 people on the 4 busses my buddy Chris personally stuck his neck out for and chartered) … the guy drove me the 40 minutes to Anderson (after spending 20 hours on a bus in the previous 48 hours and 10 of the previous 10) — to meet her there, then had to drive 40 minutes back to his house.
Every man for himself my ass!
Chris mistakes the fact that we don’t want to pass a law requiring a government bus to provide me with that service means that we are all about every man for himself.
- philmon | 10/18/2010 @ 08:38Even liberals do not listen to Matthews and others of his type. Funny thing.
Last week he was gushing over the Tea Party, and how he always thought it would be the left that would reject the establishment. Bipolar?
- jamzw | 10/18/2010 @ 09:32What I’ve always wondered is how he got that old without somebody breaking his nose.
- rob | 10/18/2010 @ 12:41Classic projection. The Left themselves wouldn’t do anything for anyone without some kind of tangible personal gain, and so they can’t visualize anyone else doing that, either.
This explains their deep suspicion of that thing they refer to as “organized religion” (whatever that is), and other institutions commonly associated with conservatives.
- cylarz | 10/18/2010 @ 23:14