Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Multiple installments, by Andrew Coyne, starting here.
H/T to Hector Owen, who adds:
At Coyne’s second post, commenter Douglas quotes former Canadian PM John Diefenbaker:
I am a Canadian,
free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way,
free to stand for what I think right,
free to oppose what I believe wrong,
or free to choose those
who shall govern my country.
This heritage of freedom
I pledge to uphold
for myself and all mankind.Canada has slid a fair way down the slippery slope since Diefenbaker came up with that, the Canadian Pledge, in the debates leading to initial passage of Canada’s Bill of Rights.
Americans should be paying more attention to this hearing. This could happen here.
It certainly can. It begins with denial, or willful ignorance, of what exactly a “right” is. If you get to keep it only until it interferes with someone else’s “right,” and then you will be made to involuntarily forfeit it, then it isn’t a right, and never was one to begin with.
Rights are invalidated retroactively. They enter in conflict with each other all the time; and once one right is laid down out of deference to the other, then it never existed as a right in the first place, but instead only as a privilege.
You’ve got the right to speak freely or you’ve got the right to look around and not be offended. For both rights to exist in the same jurisdiction, is an impossibility. And people have the balls to scribble down one of these rights but not the other…because only one of them makes any sense.
If the unwritten one prevails over the written one, then all written rights are meaningless. And yes the same thing can happen down here. Most of the Supreme Court assemblies we have had throughout the years, would have taken the language in HRA section 7.1 and ripped it to shreds. Probably, the people who sit on that bench today, would as well. But this is not a guaranteed thing by any means.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.