Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Very often, coming up with a name for something is the first step toward getting rid of it. It’s hard to reject something when it doesn’t have a name. In fact, we as a modern society have a longstanding habit of rejecting some things maybe we shouldn’t be rejecting, just because someone, somewhere, came up with a name for them. For example, when we reject “discrimination” we reject an entire mode of thinking, not only about people but about things as well; it’s a survival instinct, one that has served the human race capably in the past. Does it really make sense for a restaurant to be forced to hire ugly waitresses, or a trucking company to be forced to hire blind drivers? “Bush Doctrine” is something a lot of people think is within their comprehension, when it really isn’t, and it never was as formalized as a lot of people seem to believe. And then there’s “patriarchy,” “neocon,” “teabagger,” and many others. My very favorite of all time has to be “swift-boating,” which near as I can figure means to damage the campaign of a liberal democrat by telling the truth about what he said or what he did.
We have a lot of things infesting us that seem to hang around from one year to the next, because nobody puts together an organized campaign to make ’em go away. And it isn’t possible to put together such a campaign if these things aren’t named. I thought, without taking the time to actually invent the names, I should start a little list of what they are. Maybe if time allows I’ll add some more items to the list, and then switch over to the right side of my brain and invent some slurs as best I can. Although I got a feeling that when it comes to that, I’d be better off outsourcing that part of the project to someone more creative and talented.
Early in the morning, while the coffee was fresh and before the sun came up, I managed to jot down ten.
1. That branch of feminism that seeks to divide privilege from responsibility, so that all gender disparities having to do with privilege can be ended, but disparities dealing with responsibility can endure indefinitely.
2. That sect of Christianity that seeks to win converts through fear and threats, by linking random disasters to the vengeance of an angry, spurned God.
3. Excessive adoration for a public figure based not on the sensibilities of his ideas, or their likely success, but rather on the uneducated perception that he would be a close and dear friend if only his acquaintance could be made somehow.
4. Pronouncing oneself to be the champion of a debate after having deployed nothing but “zingers.”
5. The mistaken belief that war must be caused by those who show the temerity to acknowledge it is coming, or to respond to its arrival, or to prepare for its arrival, or to enlist for the purpose of responding to it.
6. Making horrible ideas look like possibly-good ideas, by socially stigmatizing their opposites.
7. When an awful idea of yours is put to a test, and fails, behaving as if history began the day after that test; conveniently forgetting about any & all occasions on which the idea has been exposed as a miserable failure.
8. Insisting that secular people like you are just as moral as religious people, and then defining morality according to your own personal likes and dislikes — how else could it be done? — completely missing the irony.
9. The notion held by certain people “at the top” of a structure of money, power or prestige, that people beneath this level should be forced to cope with limits that don’t apply up there. Hypocrisy coupled-up with a sense of elitism.
10. Angry people show off their anger. Say they’re angry because they don’t have stuff. The other people get them whatever it is they want. The angry people stay angry as if they were never given the stuff, even though they were. TIK #52.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
One pass through the free association filter yields:
1. Vaginism: That branch of feminism that seeks to divide privilege from responsibility, so that all gender disparities having to do with privilege can be ended, but disparities dealing with responsibility can endure indefinitely.
2. The Apocolyptics: That sect of Christianity that seeks to win converts through fear and threats, by linking random disasters to the vengeance of an angry, spurned God.
3. Fellatioration: Excessive adoration for a public figure based not on the sensibilities of his ideas, or their likely success, but rather on the uneducated perception that he would be a close and dear friend if only his acquaintance could be made somehow.
4. The Putzion: Pronouncing oneself to be the champion of a debate after having deployed nothing but “zingers.”
5. Warriortizationism: The mistaken belief that war must be caused by those who show the temerity to acknowledge it is coming, or to respond to its arrival, or to prepare for its arrival, or to enlist for the purpose of responding to it.
6. Intellexecution: Making horrible ideas look like possibly-good ideas, by socially stigmatizing their opposites.
7. Prevalidization: When an awful idea of yours is put to a test, and fails, behaving as if history began the day after that test; conveniently forgetting about any & all occasions on which the idea has been exposed as a miserable failure.
8. Evilation: Insisting that secular people like you are just as moral as religious people, and then defining morality according to your own personal likes and dislikes — how else could it be done? — completely missing the irony.
9. Cake-Eatery: The notion held by certain people “at the top” of a structure of money, power or prestige, that people beneath this level should be forced to cope with limits that don’t apply up there. Hypocrisy coupled-up with a sense of elitism.
10. BabyHueys: Angry people show off their anger. Say they’re angry because they don’t have stuff. The other people get them whatever it is they want. The angry people stay angry as if they were never given the stuff, even though they were.
- vanderleun | 05/02/2010 @ 16:04I like ’em.
- mkfreeberg | 05/02/2010 @ 19:32That’s some pretty good free association!
- pdwalker | 05/03/2010 @ 07:121. Womynism: That branch of feminism that seeks to divide privilege from responsibility, so that all gender disparities having to do with privilege can be ended, but disparities dealing with responsibility can endure indefinitely.
2. Pan-Gaism: Those of any religious affiliation that seek to win converts through fear and threats, by linking random disasters to the vengeance of an angry, spurned God.
3. Idolatry: Excessive adoration for a public figure based not on the sensibilities of his ideas, or their likely success, but rather on the uneducated perception that he would be a close and dear friend if only his acquaintance could be made somehow.
4. Locutionism: Pronouncing oneself to be the champion of a debate after having deployed nothing but “zingers.”
5. Chamberlainism: The mistaken belief that war must be caused by those who show the temerity to acknowledge it is coming, or to respond to its arrival, or to prepare for its arrival, or to enlist for the purpose of responding to it.
6. Qualitative Research: Making horrible ideas look like possibly-good ideas, by socially stigmatizing their opposites.
7. Socialism: When an awful idea of yours is put to a test, and fails, behaving as if history began the day after that test; conveniently forgetting about any & all occasions on which the idea has been exposed as a miserable failure.
8. Relativism: Insisting that secular people like you are just as moral as religious people, and then defining morality according to your own personal likes and dislikes — how else could it be done? — completely missing the irony.
9. Noblisobligism: The notion held by certain people “at the top” of a structure of money, power or prestige, that people beneath this level should be forced to cope with limits that don’t apply up there. Hypocrisy coupled-up with a sense of elitism.
10. Entitlementism: Angry people show off their anger. Say they’re angry because they don’t have stuff. The other people get them whatever it is they want. The angry people stay angry as if they were never given the stuff, even though they were. TIK #52.
- Fai Mao | 05/03/2010 @ 17:10[…] come it’s so much trouble to get ‘em made? 17. What Gerard calls Vaginism and Fai Mao calls Womynism: Feminism sees a gender disparity that has to do with stature or privilege, feminism works overtime […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/04/2010 @ 06:44I was going to try, but I have been beaten before I began.
Excellent work.
- philmon | 05/04/2010 @ 08:23