Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
The quote for the day over on Spiced Sass is a gem from C. S. Lewis. I wish I were laboring under a bit more difficulty to see how it is about to become relevant; but I fear, we’re about to live and breathe the truism of this bit of wisdom, day in, day out, for two long years at least.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I would add, further, that when injustice is brazenly thrust upon a minority for the sake of bringing artificial comfort to a majority, we’ve set down a treacherous road, something desirable in politics but deeply offensive to common sense. One reasonable observer, no matter what his leanings, would acknowledge that where a little bit of injustice might be acceptable, a whole lot of it would be far less so. And where a little bit of comfort might be a decent thing, a whole lot of it is something that shouldn’t be needed quite so much.
And so, to our notions of common sense, a crop that yields both injustice for some and comfort for others, should be harvested only in small doses. If at all.
It just doesn’t work that way in politics. In politics, if a little of something is good, a whole lot of it must be better. You oppress the electorate for the electorate’s own benefit, fleecing the rich to provide for the poor…it really doesn’t matter if the poor spend the public treasury money on big-screen television sets or baby formula. It doesn’t matter. We already “voted” on whether they need the money.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.