Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Good and Evil
This, in 2006, is what it’s all about. Some things are good, some things are evil. Some people are good, some people are evil. Nobody disagrees with this.
That’s a pretty strong statement isn’t it? Nobody disagrees? Isn’t there someone to be found who will disagree with just about anything that can be said? Well in this case, it appears not. Sure, I use words like “good” and “evil” and some people are offended by such language. Sure, there are even people who are called “moral relativists,” and there are even people who call themselves the same thing. Moral relativist, and proud to be one. All things are relative.
But that camp only disagrees cosmetically. Nobody in that camp, nobody I’ve met anyhow, is willing to sign on to the statement “there is no such thing as evil.” Because within the perimeter of the things of which I’ve been able to gain consciousness, the moral relativists want to keep that status of “evil” available. They want to use it to describe anyone who disagrees with them and actually achieves something because of it. This, according to the relativists, is evil. Once they engage such an “evil” in any sort of contest, they behave, in so many ways, as if they’re engaged in some kind of Holy War. There may be some exceptions to this. Speaking for myself, I have encountered none.
So there ya have it. “Everybody agrees.” What’s controversial, is whether or not you should admit you believe in it all the time, or whether you’re only a “fair weather friend” to the whole thing about good-and-evil, hauling it out of the closet only occasionally, to support an agenda of apathy, anarchy and nihilism.
I can’t imagine what it would be like to have convinced myself I disbelieve a concept in which not only do I believe, but use with great frequency and enthusiasm. There has to be something brain-damaged about that. It either manifests the brain damage, or it will surely lead to it. Maybe both.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.