Archive for January, 2010

Why “The Rules” Don’t Work

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Some fifteen years ago there was this book put out by a couple of bitter women called The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. Men all over the civilized world, within the tenth of a second they took to analyze the phenomenon, had exactly the same thought: This shit would send me running away screaming, so if “The Rules” really do work then these millions of excited women must be looking for someone different from me. You see, there is an unstated, unifying principle behind each and every one of The Rules, and the unifying principle is this — actually, it’s a small double-handful of principles: The man should do more work, the woman should decide more things, the man should know less about what’s going on, and the whole experience should cost him a good amount of money.

This, I think, feels mighty good to you if you’re an available female and you’ve been through some unsatisfying dating experiences, particularly if you’re the one that got dumped. It doesn’t follow from that that these are rules that will work in your future dating endeavors. But the women got excited about the book anyway, by the millions. And this puts the big reveal on the kind of women who like this stuff: If you put them in the right emotional frame of mind, and then tell them some things that aren’t true, you can get whatever you want out of them. Hmmm. I think I know why their dating lives might not have been fulfilling.

Most prominently displayed quote at The Rules home page: Oprah Winfrey. “The Rules isn’t just a book, it’s a movement, honey.” Yes, that Oprah Winfrey. I rest my case.

Well, I don’t know why Vox Populi waited this long to critique The Rules (hat tip to The Ness in Darkness), but I’m glad he did. Wonder if the people who need to read it, will ever see it.

Rule 1: Be a “Creature Unlike Any Other”

Given that Playboy has spent five decades proving the near-universal male predilection for a slender, pretty, large-breasted, blue-eyed blonde, this rule is obviously insane. In fact, most men have distinct preferences that anyone who knows them well can easily identify…Women are naturally attracted to outliers for the sheer sake of their novelty. Men aren’t.

Rule 2: Show Up to Parties, Dances, and Social Events Even if You Do Not Feel Like It.

This makes sense, but you probably shouldn’t bother if you’re just going to be a tiresome bitch. Unless it’s a Goth party, then feel free to mope and whine all you like, Lady Dolorous.
:
Rule 5: Don’t Call Him & Rarely Return His Calls

That’s fine. He’ll be busy having sex with the woman who calls him at 11 PM to see if he happens to be free at the moment and you’re just another haughty bitch who can’t be bothered to call him back anyway. This is easily the worst Rule, as it is designed to ensure that the only men who will continue to call you are terminally obsessed stalkers.

Rule 6: Always End Phone Calls First

This Rule is fine, because there isn’t a single man on the planet who keeps track of who hung up first. Besides, he’s either reading his emails, surfing the Internet, or playing video games while you’re rambling on and on about who said what to whom anyhow.

There are, in my opinion, quite a few women who sunk some money into this book and still have it on their shelves to this very day even though they’re still single and miserable. There is an unhappy phenomenon taking place here…and it is not exclusively female, although it is perhaps predominantly female. The phenomenon is an enjoyment of the adrenaline rush that goes with the feeling of solving a problem, coupled with sustained ignorance and apathy regarding whether the problem is really being solved. The Rules were given the ol’ college try; they didn’t work, for the reasons Vox Populi states, along with some others; but the whole experience felt so damn good. Especially those above-mentioned principles according to which men shouldn’t decide anything and they shouldn’t be in control of anything.

Of the millions of old copies of The Rules that were snatched up all those years ago, I speculate further that more than half of them reek of cat urine.

Best Sentence LXXVIII

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Proof Positive takes the Best Sentence I’ve Heard Or Read Lately (BSIHORL) award today:

I don’t think that there’s much question that our culture is going over a cliff. I think the only question may be: “How long are the skid marks?”

Star Trek IV: Save the Whales

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Back on Christmas Day I wondered openly whether Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home was not the most preachy lib-fest guilt-trip movie ever slapped on the big screen.

Well, we just picked up my kid from Nevada…who, as I mentioned before, shares my fascination with cheeseball 80’s dreck. So we watched it again, and I noticed something new: The repeated guilt-slams that occur throughout the last hour or so are all just dessert. The establishment of the plot line is the main course.

A malevolent entity — the “whale probe” — begins carving a destructive swath through our beloved planet, threatening its destruction. The response is to ponder what we did to piss it off. Not a single instant of footage manifests any curiosity from anyone regarding its origin. With V’Ger, our intrepid crew pondered both of these things…why are you so mean, and from whence did you come. I guess between ST:I and ST:IV a twenty-third-century Obama must have been elected. V’Ger should have been so lucky.

Shouldn’t Star Trek V should have been titled “Find Out What Sonofabitch Sent This Thing To Us And Make Them Into A Glass Parking Lot” or something? That might have worked a lot better than deliberately pissing off Christians yet one more time.

“Penis Monologues”?

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Little PrickLike any good progressive, I’ve gone from admiration to hope to disappointment to anger when it comes to this president. Now I’m fast getting to rage. I’ve really been trying not to write an article every other week about all the things I don’t like about Barack Obama. But the little prick is making it very hard.

Really, are you going to spend the next three interminable years perfecting your whiney victim persona? I don’t really think I could bear that. Hearing you complain about how rough it all is, when you have vastly more power than any of us to fix it? Please. Not that.

David Michael Green, professor of political science at Hofstra University, OpEdNews December 19, 2009

From The Morning After.

By way of blogger friend Gerard.

FrankJ’s New Year’s Resolutions…

Monday, January 4th, 2010

for the country, that is.

Try to owe fewer dollars in debt than there are stars in the known universe.

Let’s try and set a realistic goal here. We have a liberal president and a liberal Congress, so debt is going to increase. They just love spending too much. But let’s at least keep the debt from being so large it collapses upon itself into a singularity and destroys the solar system.

Try to check the plausibility of events before creating a media firestorm.

“Oh no! A kid in a runaway balloon! How could this happen to a family of media whores?”

While continuing to trust science, let’s make sure the scientists we’re getting it from aren’t douche nozzles…

And it gets even better:

Next time we pick a leader, let’s make sure he has more qualifications than a bunch of empty slogans of the sort you’d use to sell carbonated beverages…

If we have another economic crisis, let’s not hand a blank checkbook to a bunch of Democrats…

Try and make sure tax money isn’t going towards child prostitution…

I think we should all be able to agree with these, right?

The GOP’s Case for Change in November

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Hugh Hewitt rattles off the bullet points. A successful midterm campaign would capture each one of them, and make the best use of all. That’s not asking too much is it?

First, the government takeover of private life is deeply alarming. The massive thrusts of Washington, D.C. into the control of health care, the car business, the banks generally and the home loan industry specifically — all these are obvious and disquietingly huge intrusions of the federal government’s presence into private life.

Americans hate to be pushed around, especially by the federal government. The president’s plans for even more power grabs via the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Interior using “global warming” as an excuse haven’t yet touched most Americans, but they are out in the open and coming. Only a rebalancing of power in D.C. will forestall further metastasis of government.

A second reason to rebalance the House and Senate by voting for the GOP is the simple fact that must be repeated again and again: Lower taxes equal job growth. Whatever minor improvement in the unemployment numbers that emerges in 2010 — if any — will be threatened by the looming lapse of the Bush tax cuts in 2011 unless Congress obliges the president to abandon his “spread the wealth” gospel that views every tax increase as a form of economic justice, regardless of the cost in real jobs.
:
The endless blaming of George W. Bush has also become an obvious dodge of responsibility, a childish complaint that satisfies only the hard Left. The president has played that card so often and in so many circumstances that the mention of Obama’s predecessor by any senior administration official has become a laugh line or a cue in a drinking game.

It Didn’t Go on the Cutting Room Floor

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

It was put up on the White House Flickr page. And how come that is, anyway?

Another Black Consevative comments,

Personally, as a photographer this shot would have been in my discard pile. The reduced size image makes Obama look sleepy or worse yet, tipsy. Sleepy or tipsy looking images of the president should be an automatic red flag to discard the image for any photographer.

Even the high resolution version leaves much to be desired. Obama looks like he has contempt for Biden (given the Joe “The Gaff Machine” Biden’s performance this year, that maybe a possibility). This again reminds me of how this administration seems to have become oblivious to the images they project to the public.

But…but…but…when you put people in charge who are obsessed with image, sure you might lose out on substance. But you at the very least always get the awareness of image, right? Right?

Or the image of awareness?

Guess not. I guess sometimes you sacrifice all other competencies for that one thing, and then you lose that one thing as well.

Ready to call it a failed experiment yet?

democrats’ Worst Nightmare: Terrorism On Their Watch

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Big Government:

From the time he launched his campaign for president three years ago, Barack Obama had to consider how he would react to the first serious act of terrorism during the campaign, or if he won, on his watch. His fellow Democrats had been thinking about the moment even longer – since the September day in 2001 when attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon defined George W. Bush’s presidency and gave Republicans a decisive advantage on a defining political issue.

And yet the White House’s response to last week’s attempt to blow up a Northwest Airlines flight to Detroit could rank as one of the low points of the new president’s first year. Over the course of five days, Obama’s Obama’ reaction ranged from low-keyed to reassuring to, finally, a vow to find out what went wrong. The episode was a baffling, unforced error in presidential symbolism, hardly a small part of the presidency, and the moment at which yet another of the old political maxims that Obama had sought to transcend – the Democrats’ vulnerability on national security – reasserted itself.

Hat tip to Jawa Report.

It’s an even bigger weakness when you stop to consider what it will take to turn it around: The democrat method of fighting terror, has to succeed in a situation in which it can be asserted, in fact it is undeniable, that the opponents methods would have manifestly failed.

Which means — we have to actually see certain disaster averted because some Great Compromiser had the courage to sit down and Talk Out Our Differences With Our Enemies. The “Picard Maneuver” has to actually work in practice, not just continue to drift around as a theory among those who live out pathetic lives to avoid confrontation.

In other words — it’s not changing. And if anyone is tasked with the job of changing it, they should ask themselves who they pissed off to get that job.

Dems Blast Rasmussen

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Have you noticed there is no large-scale protest in the wake of a poll, or for that matter an election, in which the liberal viewpoint prevails? You’re not imagining it. It’s a time-honored tactic practiced by the hard left to always, always, always make sure you have the last word in everything. And it’s worked well for them so why should they stop?

And so when they win, it’s “The People Have Spoken.” No ifs, ands or buts. When they lose, Diebold must have been up to some shenanigans. If it’s something close to a tie, it’s time for a whole slew of “recounts”…at the end of which, they win. Try to think of some exceptions to this. You can’t. Ann Coulter once said somewhere, we might as well have a rule that you’ve got to give an election to democrats if they lose by less than a thousand votes. And from the history I can recall, she’s right.

Latest target: Scott Rasmussen. Get out the torches and pitchforks, and for Gaea’s sake make sure the cameras are rolling!

The pointed attacks reflect a hardening conventional wisdom among prominent liberal bloggers and many Democrats that Rasmussen Reports polls are, at best, the result of a flawed polling model and, at worst, designed to undermine Democratic politicians and the party’s national agenda.

On progressive-oriented websites, anti-Rasmussen sentiment is an article of faith. “Rasmussen Caught With Their Thumb on the Scale,” blared the Daily Kos this summer. “Rasmussen Reports, You Decide,” the blog Swing State Project recently headlined in a play on the Fox News motto.

I suppose, if you’re pre-disposed to think a certain thing just because there is a large number of other people already thinking it, you’d be statistically likely to vote democrat — especially right about now — and you’d be an important part of that constituency. They wouldn’t want to give you up without a fight.

It just seems to me a funny thing to try to attack…this notion that the Obama experiment has been given a fair shake, and found to be something less than a genuine success. If that’s the hill they wanna die on, 2010 will bring a whole lot more fighting that will have to be done. Oh well. That’s the choice they’ve made, so keep an eye out.

It’s funny, isn’t it? Toward the end of George W. Bush’s second term, as his approval rate dipped downward into the mid-thirties, it became a conservative talking point to deny he was a genuine conservative. With Obama, the insistence that He is more moderate than liberal stretches backward, clear back to Day One, and with the undertone that this is a good thing. Whereas with Bush and the conservatives, the conservatives were arguing that the President was not giving their ideology a fair shake, that he should have been injured with this lack of good credential. And that this was happening.

The data seem to back this up. Bush pursued conservative policies, his approval rating went up; he pursued liberal policies, reached “across the aisle,” went-all-wobbly, his approval rating went down.

The alternative, euphemistic adjective for liberal is “progressive”; there is none defined or required, so far as I know, for the conservative counterpart.

“The Misandry Bubble”

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

The Futurist has an essay up of some 12,000 words give-or-take (hat tip: Cassy Fiano), on why it seems civilization is quickly disintegrating under our feet:

The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020.

Our take on it? Yes, you’re “undervaluing” people when you denigrate them simply for being what they are, regardless of their actions or lack thereof. And you certainly “overvalue” them when you worship them for being certain things rather than doing certain things.

That’s not intended as a promotion of my own view of why civilization seems to be crumbling under our feet; although that remains my answer to the question today. It is crumbling under our feet because we are no longer fit to stand upon it, because of a number of issues that all trace back to our predilection for passing judgment on each other for what we are, rather than for what we do. What The Futurist is exploring is one small facet of this sickness. Women good, men bad, and who cares what any of them actually do.

We are undervaluing work, overvaluing entertainment, undervaluing defense, overvaluing compromise, undervaluing meat, overvaluing organic vegetables, undervaluing competition, overvaluing empathy…et cetera. Because we’re trying too hard to think like women.

Speaking just for myself, that is not intended to bash women. If we were to undervalue them and overvalue men, and embark on all the thought transgressions that would result, our consequential societal problems would be just as severe. But “If” is ultimately a game for children. In the real world, things are what they are; and we are out of balance, because being out of balance is a state that is in perfect harmony with our efforts.

Tilting to the Left??

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Blog geniuses at work:

Weird Books

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Click pic to view portfolio.

Cannonball Fail

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Don’t do this.

You Don’t Lead ‘Em As Much

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Tough Guy

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

New Whiskey Rebellion

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Hat tip to Primordial Slack.

One Thing

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Some language not fit for a general audience.

Hat tip to Uncommon Sense.

The States and the Stimulus

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

I sent my fifty predictions for 2010 off to Cassy Fiano on New Year’s Eve Day, as she requested. It would appear the last of those, #50,

California to become our first bankrupt state. To be followed by New York.

…may end up the first one to come true. If we are to go by the word of this Review & Outlook column in the Wall Street Journal.

Remember how $200 billion in federal stimulus cash was supposed to save the states from fiscal calamity? Well, hold on to your paychecks, because a big story of 2010 will be how all that free money has set the states up for an even bigger mess this year and into the future.

The combined deficits of the states for 2010 and 2011 could hit $260 billion, according to a survey by the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Ten states have a deficit, relative to the size of their expenditures, as bleak as that of near-bankrupt California. The Golden State starts the year another $6 billion in arrears despite a large income and sales tax hike last year. New York is literally down to its last dollar. Revenues are down, to be sure, but in several ways the stimulus has also made things worse.

This is so much bigger than Barack Obama. It is the peril of investing authority in those who are most fun to watch.

See, for the fun-to-watch to be actually electable, they have to have some idea about what they’re going to do when they got in. Even Obama had a little tiny bit of this going on during the campaign. Just enough. And their ideas have to be fun too.

What makes an idea fun? Well, it has to be theoretical. Which means it has to be untested. “Put water on that burning house” is not sufficiently theoretical because it is not sufficiently untested. Therefore it isn’t fun.

And, sadly, it has to have some irony involved too. It has to have an element of “you wouldn’t think this would work, but…” In this case, the irony is that we can get ourselves out of a fiscally unsound situation by spending lots of money on bullshit. You wouldn’t think that would work, but… And that’s the plan.

Well, more than half the time the initial impressions are correct. Bailing water into a sinking canoe is not an effective way to keep it from sinking…spraying gasoline instead of water on a house fire is not a good way to stop the fire…spending lavish sums of money on nonsense is not a good way to cure a financial headache.

The irony doesn’t serve us well. But it is fun, so we keep doing it. And we’ll do it some more, until Prediction #50 is fulfilled.

Predictions for 2010

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Blogger friend Cas wants our predictions for the year ahead. The Congress stuff seems so easy, that in my reply I just stayed away from it entirely and still spouted off fifty other items. Republicans will take back the House; they’ll fail to take the Senate, although it’s a practical impossibility for them not to pick up seats. The media will instruct us to believe that this is not, repeat not, a repeat of 1994 because of this failure to take back the Senate.

President Obama won’t really do anything besides give wonderful speeches and spend money. He’ll talk a lot about what “we” have done wrong; He and His friends aren’t included in that, they do everything perfectly. Anyhow, that’s the government policy throughout 2010, give wonderful speeches and spend lots of money. On the media side, it’s do a lot of ooh-ing and aah-ing about how wonderful the speech was and that it was the BEST ONE EVAR.

Those aren’t even predictions. They’re just observations of a stationary object. They involve no calculation-of-trajectory, no risk.

These are predictions. They were so much fun, I had to send along a thank-you-note when I finished with them.

1. Obama’s popularity to dip some more, especially among the extreme left, over gay-marriage, the Nobel speech, the public option thing.
2. Janet Napolitano will head home to spend more time with her family. It will become a popular figure of speech to say “this is so bad Janet Napolitano would say it’s perfect.”
3. GOP will become more fractured over is the earth burning up…is Sarah Palin stupid…is profiling wrong…
4. Speaking of Palin, she will stump for five GOP candidates, four of them will win, everyone will talk about the one who didn’t.
5. Morgan and his gal will go out to a nice restaurant with Cassy and her guy.
6. Oprah will have lots and lots and lots of farewell tours, just like Barbra.
7. We’re going to have some kind of environmental action, as Obama seeks to repair relations with His base.
8. Lots and lots of new jobs that don’t actually produce anything…”green” jobs…career bureaucrats…union hacks.
9. Some new bailout plan will be passed, for institutions of higher learning, and for newspapers.
10. Lots of scandal plaguing democrats and Republicans. All the Republicans will be forced to step down, all the democrats will survive.
11. Gold will pass $1750 an ounce.
12. A new reality teevee show is introduced, revolving around the family of the “Balloon Boy.” Yes, there is an injunction or parole condition that checks this, but they’ll get around it somehow.
13. Hooters loses a lawsuit and has to hire male waitresses in all their restaurants.
14. A new “health craze” is going to emerge, by way of a new book, that revolves around not-overthinking things. This has actually been going on for quite some time now, but in 2010 it will become overt and in-your-face. It will be something like what the running craze was in the 1970’s. Emotions will become much more important. Self-centeredness will become the new currency. “Mood rings,” in some form or fashion, will come back in style.
15. The Government will commission some software designer to come up with adware that pops up reminders to computer users that they need to work harder at leaving a smaller carbon footprint. It will be illegal to sell computers that don’t have this installed, or to try to remove it. The Commerce Clause will be cited as the constitutional authority for this kind of regulation.
16. Speaking of constitutionally questionable regulation, Someone will be fined and jailed for failing to buy health insurance, and only the bloggers will talk about it. Keith Olbermann and Andrew Sullivan will make fun of us. Then Sarah Palin will put up a Facebook entry mentioning it, and they’ll make fun of her too.
17. 2010 will be all carbon, all the time. The democrats will understand they have squandered all the politcal capital they ever had, and more, passing ObamaCare, and they’ll see the climate “crisis” as the one way they can get more.
18. Iraq could go in either direction. But if it is neutralized as a safe haven for terrorists, Obama will get the credit, and if it turns into a meat grinder it’ll all be Bush’s fault.
19. Iran will chug merrily along building nuclear weapons. This won’t work out to a horrible climax just yet, they’re going to be biding their time throughout 2010.
20. Those scooters people use when they’re genuinely handicapped — or just plain fat and lazy. They’re going to start putting chemical toilets into them. Just like that guy’s easy-chair in “Idiocracy.”
21. Voice recognition software will be built into keyboards. It will become as common as webcams, so everyone has it. And they’ll use it. You’ll walk into a coffee shop and the cacaphony of people “typing” will completely overwhelm you.
22. There will be some kind of successful court action that is the first step to getting “IN GOD WE TRUST” off of our money.
23. There will be some kind of congressional action making it illegal for anyone under a certain age to enter a national park, accompanied by an adult or not. Because of this, Boy Scouts will no longer do any hiking or camping, and will become an urban sing-a-long.
24. Womens’ fashions will become awful yet one more time. No bare legs, no elegant dresses, no skirts of any kind. Baggy sweat pants will be all the rage, even at formal occasions. Any woman not wearing a frumpy sweat shirt will be hissed at by other women, and said to be “dick-whipped” by her boyfriend or husband.
25. Speaking of which, they’ll make a Wonder Woman movie and she’ll be wearing ugly overalls. The story will be like one half of “Thelma & Louise,” crossed with “Erin Brockovich.” She’ll stop a mega-corporate conglomerate led by some evil man that is conspiring to (somehow) make a zillion dollars overnight by dumping toxic sludge into a river making all the adorable woodland creatures sick. Her sexuality is no longer a mystery and they make sure it’s clearly established that she’s a les[bi]an every ten minutes.
26. Oh, and ditto for Tomb Raider. She, too, will stop some middle-aged white guy who wears nice suits in the middle of the night from dumping toxic sludge into the river killing all the woodland creatures, and she’ll be out-and-proud gay.
27. Foreclosures will plateau out and then they will spike again as the interest rate goes up and up and up.
28. The occult will become popular, as people feel a need to believe in something, and feel stigmatized from believing in anything else.
29. Gene[a]logy will make a comeback. Look for a remake of “Roots.” Google will release a web-based app that will store and organize the results of personal research.
30. Watching movies at work will become commonplace, as employment fulfills less and less of a practical purpose.
31. Delivery services will become “clouded,” just like “cloud computing,” meaning there will be companies in the business of providing the delivery of groceries, bottled water, hot coffee drinks, etc. provided by other companies. And then we’ll be on the fast track to becoming the bloated floating egg-humans in Wall-E.
32. The “bonus czar” will absolutely, positively be reviewing “executive bonuses” for all firms, whether they received bailout money or not, be they publicly traded or not. And then the definition of “executive” will trickle down. And then it will be salaries, not bonuses. The government will be wanting to review resumes of network engineers and systems analysts to see if they’re worth their salt, before it’s done.
33. We’re going to try out France’s failed program of forcing everyone to work 30 hours or less per week, in an effort to force companies to hire more people.
34. The U.S. Mint will issue yet *another* awkward dollar-coin with a woman’s image on the face of it…and, just like the last three, it will be unpopular, awkward, refuse to work in vending machines the way it’s supposed to. It will be recalled and the feminists will complain. Bitterly. Again.
35. There’ll be some crisis in the middle east, gas will get more expensive, and then they’ll advertise it by the liter to make it look affordable.
36. Obama will put a solar panel on the White House. Welcome back, Carter.
37. They’ll make another Superman movie, and this time he’ll — all together now — ACTUALLY FIGHT SOMEBODY.
38. The Atlas Shrugged movie, on the other hand, will see another year come & go without getting made.
39. A talented young black guy who looks kind of like a white girl will appear on the scene and will be vigorously promoted as “The Next Michael Jackson.”
40. Secretary of State Clinton will resign, and start writing a tell-all. She’ll be responsible for starting a whole new wave of feminism, to be informally known as “Our Turn” feminism or “We’ve Waited Long Enough” feminism. It’ll have all the paranoia of all the previous waves of feminism.
41. Timothy Geithner, adieu.
42. Modesty Blaise movie.
43. They’re going to breed an even smaller dog. It’ll be informally known as a “pocket puppy.” They’ll make special sweaters for stupid girls and women who can tuck several pocket dogs away along the length of their arms. And she will have music wherever she goes…
44. Because the people who make Saturday morning cartoons absolutely loathe parents, these forms of entertainment will become even louder and more headache-inducing.
45. It will become fashionable to remake period classics, like Of Mice and Men, and Tale of Two Cities, for the present time, just like that fad of remaking Shakespeare plays for the present during the early 2000’s. In this version of Grapes of Wrath, look for the Depression to be George W. Bush’s fault. Tom Joad will be played by Ice Cube.
46. “Obama” will become a popular slang term to describe a manager who is constantly giving wonderful speeches and organizing “summits” but never actually doing anything to improve any situation besides spending lots of money.
47. Apple will come out with a new device that can store as much music as an iPod, but clip in place behind the ear so you can’t tell if someone’s listening to you or rocking out.
48. Employers will be forbidden from discriminating against people who can’t show up on time.
49. Cable television companies will be required to make sure no more than 50% of their channels are in English because that’s racist.
50. California to become our first bankrupt state. To be followed by New York.

God Damn the Naughts

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Jules Crittenden is among those happy to see the last decade go. He has many strong arguments on his side, including some personal tragedies, and some others having to do with things that happened to us all. They’re all based on truth.

And the common thread amongst them is this: In the last ten year we seem to have become awfully fond of the idea that all others must agree with us on this issue or that one — lock-step — or else they’re evil. And, of course, this divisive situation is all the other fellow’s fault. Where’d we get this? Since Y2K, this funny idea has been in a full, and none too pleasing, bloom.

What is it? Did Bush vs. Gore really do that to us?

God damn the naughts.

God damn the Naughts. It was a perverse decade, in which that thing so many responsible people had agreed was the right thing to do, the removal of a dangerous, mass-murdering dictator, was strangely rendered not just unnecessary but an evil act, by an unexpected twist of fate. The accusations of lies were themselves lies, all of it built on a tyrant’s framework of lies, that together became an unquenchable fire that just burned hotter. It was as revolting as the stench of death, the way they tried to make it meaningless and wrong. Except that death is honest.
:
God damn the Naughts.

It was odd, how people turned to the kind of naivete that got us into all of that in the first place. Maybe they expected a cheap kind of messianic deliverance. That’s not so odd. In dire times, people have always wanted the easy out. I remember as well the unexpected feeling of relief when they had their way. They wanted it, let them have it, as one friend said. That feeling wouldn’t last long.

Hat tip to blogger friend Buck.

Muram Aries Attigit

Friday, January 1st, 2010

Lawyerspeak gold. A Political Glimpse From Ireland points to a highly entertaining and enlightening seven-page piece of correspondence from counselor to counselor. The subject is a potential defamation suit coming from Twitter-tweets tweeted by an unhappy customer. See Section III of the letter first, for the salient facts. Political Glimpse explains:

The letter, which deserves to be read in full, concludes with the declaration that the customer intends to pursue counteraction according to the principle of muram aries attigit, which translates as “the ram has touched the wall.”

This refers to a Roman military policy toward cities the Romans placed under siege. The local authority would be told that, as a matter of policy, once the first battering ram touched the city wall, there would be no surrender accepted, no quarter and no mercy.