Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Well, that is an interesting way of looking at it (hat tip to Weird and Pissed Off)…
There’s no energy left in liberalism, no excitement, just more rules, more controls, everything the punks hated. You can’t say this, you can’t think that, everybody read the memo – today we’re scheduled to be angry at people don’t want to subsidize our birth control!
:
What’s hilarious is that it’s us hidebound, repressed, sex-hating conservatives who are the ones trying to liberate liberalism’s victims from its fascisty clutches, but its greatest victims are the ones doing the most resisting.
:
Liberalism never tries anything new. It’s a greatest hits album from a crappy band. It’s like the latest incarnation of Styx when whoever the lead singer is announces, “Hey, here’s something off our new album” to the widespread groans of the fans. They just want to hear the classics – more regulations, more taxes, more dough for public employee unions, more stifling of innovation.
What exactly does conservatism seek to conserve? Civilization, the blessings that come from having it, and the definitions that make civilization possible.
From what does liberalism seek to liberate us? Those things — starting with the definitions. Marriage is not marriage. Illegal isn’t. The nation’s border isn’t here, and maybe the nation isn’t either. “Working families” often don’t. And often aren’t.
For what? A bunch of stuff that’s been tried before already. Their response to that is everything they can do to discourage everyone from remembering what happened before; and that’s their idea of looking forward, forgetting the past. Even the accumulation of knowledge must be re-defined. They think they’re learning new things, and teaching new things, when they proliferate ignorance.
It is the ideology of darkness and despair. It can’t be anything else. Wherever liberals have won, those among us who produce useful things toil under a new cumulative layer of influence wielded by those among us who do not produce.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
[…] Quoting me, as I explored this previously: […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/08/2014 @ 02:13[…] to describe ideas that are middle of the road. Which we do. So to reconcile that, we go back to what I had to say about the modern usage of these terms, which is the most sensible thing anybody’s had to say […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/23/2014 @ 08:04[…] example of the true difference between conservatism and liberalism, in this day and age. The way I defined […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/25/2015 @ 06:59[…] upon a time, a few months ago, I defined conservatism in this […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 08/20/2015 @ 20:12[…] upon a time, a few months ago, I defined conservatism in this […]
- On Enlistment, Citizenship, Marriage and Other Burdens | H2o Positivo | 08/21/2015 @ 04:15[…] me […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/30/2015 @ 06:44[…] the process of defining anything is to be shunned, along with anyone who calls for it. Quoting myself on where the definitions fit into […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/15/2015 @ 09:55[…] And what motivates their opposition is, […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 02/28/2016 @ 12:22[…] I’ve noted before, the terms “conservatism” and “liberalism” work much better when you think […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 08/30/2016 @ 06:26[…] preservation, or destruction, respectively. There’s nothing new about this. I’ve called it out a few times […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/06/2016 @ 10:00[…] This is not the same as your no-borders liberal who simply selects against the law he doesn’t like, as a child would select against vanilla ice cream because he prefers chocolate. Conservatism is occasionally clarified as the “law and order” ideology, but this is an oversimplification. It’s more like this: We have laws to preserve civilization. Conservatism itself, also, is there to preserve civilization, as I said before: […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 02/09/2017 @ 19:02[…] No; it’s conservatism we have to understand first. Then we can envision liberalism as the opposite. I have yet to see a definition that works better than mine: […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 04/19/2017 @ 05:51[…] What exactly does conservatism seek to conserve? Civilization, the blessings that come from having it, and the definitions that make civilization possible. From what does liberalism seek to liberate us? Those things — starting with the definitions. — Me […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 06/06/2017 @ 06:14[…] many years now I’ve been going on like a broken record about definitions. I simplify the schism between left and right, depicting the left as opposed to definitions and the […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 06/23/2017 @ 06:13[…] Update 11-11-17: 7. Conservatism, liberalism, socialism, fascism: No, conservatism is not a bunch of reflexive “no no no” against every new idea that comes along, the stuff we call “liberalism” today is not about liberty, socialism is not about making life fair, and fascism is not some spectrum-opposite of socialism with the forced redistribution of wealth removed. That’s not right at all. For conservatism and liberalism, you’re far better off referring back to what I had to say about it: […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/11/2017 @ 07:37[…] definition I use works better than any other. I point to it often. Although it’s been criticized for falling […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 12/02/2017 @ 19:40[…] My definitions are imbued with the unique desirable advantage of actually working, even across acros…: […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/26/2018 @ 04:58