Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
It’s the source of all the arguing we ever do, especially now, because all thinking adults fall into one camp or another. And each individual further ensconces himself into his chosen role every time he does more thinking.
Defined originally here.
What follows are supplements to that.
1. Architects are not concerned about whether someone else possesses more wealth than they do. Their concern over whether someone else possesses more skill, begins and ends on the question of whether or not that other person can help them in some way, and whether there may be low-hanging fruit for them in the self-improvement department.
Medicators don’t want anybody else to have something they don’t have, be it skill or money. Jealousy is a common failing for the Medicator. They easily fall prey to “Tall Poppy” syndrome.
2. Architects see the entire universe as an assembly of parts, each of which in turn can be further dissembled into smaller parts. Eventually you get down to atomic parts that cannot be divided any further. As these parts interact with each other, you have an explanation for every single other thing that happens. Events have a cause-and-effect relationship with one another. Objects have a my-state-affects-your-state relationship with one another. Objects and events are not synonymous, it’s more like: Object, plus object, plus time, equals event.
Medicators see the entire universe as a situation. Objects within the situation are not separable from other objects, unless you’re casting an object as a catalyst for something that is good or bad. And when that happens, “object” and “event” are functionally synonymous. Neither is terribly complex, they’re just beneficial, damaging, or some other synonyms of those. George W. Bush makes bad things happen, Barack Obama causes “hope.”
3. Because Architects see all things as an assembly of other things, when a complex device is not working properly they want to break it down, find out which component is faulty, and fix or replace it. Then they want to put it all back together again and watch it begin a second functional life.
Medicators evaluate complex mechanisms in bulk. If the entire assembly does not work as it should, they infer that each piece of it must be contaminated by whatever flaw is inside, and their tendency is to counsel toward replacing all of it. If this does not happen, they get frustrated.
4. Observing a system set up by someone else, an Architect is rather unconcerned about how it works inside unless it shows signs of holding a solution to some vexing problem the Architect has been trying to solve. If he perceives that much to be the case, he’ll want to take it apart and study it.
A Medicator is distressed by signs that the system works internally in a way different from the way he would have designed it; interestingly, if the system achieves objectives outside the Medicator’s design potential, he is unconcerned with this. He wants things to be built the way he would have built them, even if this means they could do fewer things.
5. Consensus holds very little meaning for the Architect, who sees it as simply a component within the human social condition, which in turn is just another component within the universe. He does not see group agreement as any kind of a lodestar. To him, group decisions may be right or they may be wrong. If they’re wrong, he wants to use what’s right and he doesn’t care who wanted to do it the other way.
Medicators assign far greater meaning to group consensus. They are distressed by proposals that would challenge it or deviate from it. Mistakes made by Medicators are often traced to excessive weight being attached to the consensus.
6. Architects are deficient in perceiving the group consensus as it is being formed. These people are often the last in the room to figure out where it is headed as it is evolves. They are generally sluggish in figuring out what is going on around them. Architects are far more likely to miss a social engagement because they have been working on a project.
Medicators, on the other hand, are especially adept at perceiving the group consensus. This is often, but by no means always, because they are taking on a role in driving it as it evolves. They “grok,” which means to observe something and then bond with it, until the distinction is lost between whether the observer is manipulating the observed or vice-versa. When you watch a Medicator interact with his environment, the governing principle is Heisenberg.
7. Architects tend to have tin ears. They are often caught in situations in which what they say might be welcome on some other occasion with a different emotional overtone, but is not appealing in the moment because their timing is off. Wherever an Architect has ultimately distinguished himself as being somewhat competent in this area, it is the culmination of many years of puzzle-solving, with the peers around him being the puzzle; it isn’t the genuine emotional empathy it appears to be.
Medicators are more in tune with the emotional tenor of the setting. If they err in the timing of some remark or another, they demonstrate gifts as they self-correct from this, diminishing their social losses and enhancing their social gains.
8. Architects, being more in tune with the cause-and-effect nature of the phenomena around them, are more at ease with assuming responsibility for the correctness of a certain course of action. They view any research into the political ramifications of such decisions as an unwelcome hassle.
Medicators place much greater weight on the decisions of others. They regard decisions in a much better light if someone has already done the same thing. They are not good at blazing new trails and are highly uncomfortable trying.
9. Architects tend to see property and wealth as compensation for time, services or goods. Consequently, they see an unusually high personal accumulation of wealth as a sign of productivity, efficiency, or possibly theft.
Medicators do not see material property as a metric. Their tendency is to envision wealth as a desirable commodity that is distributed randomly. They see a distribution that should have taken place, and another distribution that really did take place — these two are always different.
10. An Architect decides what to do, from one minute to the next, as the culmination of some logical thought process involving tasks yet incomplete, the block of uninterrupted time anticipated to be available, and a schedule of priorities. Unexpected interruptions upset them. If the non-discretionary expense of time (job or chore) has already been completed, the Architect may indulge in a recreation. The recreation always involves building something.
Medicators decide what to do according to a more emotional process. There is “work” and there is “play”; play is preferred, but overruled if the work is urgent or has been neglected for too long. If nothing is overdue, the Medicator is far more likely to play. Play does not involve building anything.
11. An Architect is unlikely to suffer from an addiction because he doesn’t possess the requisite sensitivity to his own emotional profile to feel the temporary benefits of abusing something.
Medicators are highly likely to form addictions, usually of all likes and kinds: Substance, alcohol, co-dependent relationships, sex, an engaging video game, etc. That’s what they do. They medicate.
12. An Architect’s free time will all be channeled into one project, which will live onward until it achieves the point of evolution he had in mind for it at the beginning, or until he tires of it. If he does not have the resources to attend to this, he will spend the free time on something that might expand his understanding of the task at hand.
A Medicator’s free time will be channeled into something entertaining or emotionally uplifting. It is a hallmark of the Medicator to feel withdrawal symptoms if some singular favorite activity — which remains a consistent attachment, across decades — is not partaken within some amount of time. This activity is an activity of ritual, sometimes involving score-keeping. It is non-edifying. This is the “medicating.”
13. Architects rarely “Tweet.” Many of them have yet to figure out Twitter.
Medicators pretty much live there.
14. An Architect expects an arbitration or judgment to be decided by the applicable laws and the circumstances of the case.
A Medicator is more likely to root for the underdog. He will defend, and even champion, a case with an illogical outcome so long as the outcome is favorable to the party for which he feels the greater empathy.
15. To an Architect, building something that does not work is the same as starting to build something and giving up; which is the same as never even bothering to start. Intentions don’t mean very much to an Architect.
Medicators care about intentions over outcome. Perception is as important as reality, and in some cases more important than reality. They are often caught “remembering” some grand effort to have been a raging success when history recalls it to have been a dismal failure.
16. Architects believe there is some connection between what happens to a person, and what the person did or didn’t do to make it happen or keep it from happening. If the connection is not immediately evident, they believe with some diligent research it will soon become obvious. Architects see people as products of individual actions.
Medicators do not recognize such a connection between deeds and events — they even remain skeptical when hard evidence is presented to this effect. They see events as more-or-less random and disconnected from a person’s actions, and people as fortunate-or-unfortunate beings of randomness that coincide with these events.
17. Because Architects are more inextricably connected to reality, they do not see too many options available when a lecture is given to a student and the student cannot pay attention. You can lower your assessment of the child’s maturity, discipline, and grasp of the subject matter; you can kick his ass. You can wait for him to get older and try it later.
Medicators medicate. Even your relationship to your own brain is a collision of randomness, which if an unfortunate one, can and should be remedied. Prescribe some goop for the child and try again.
18. Evaluating a job candidate, an Architect would like to present a difficult problem and observe him trying to solve it. He considers everything else a waste of time.
The Medicator would like to know that a third party has assessed the candidate to be capable of completing some class of tasks. He does not care who this third party is, exactly, nor is he too concerned about whether the tasks at which the candidate is deemed competent, coincide much with the work that has to be done. Certifications, degrees, and the like, will absolutely dazzle him. He is not evaluating ability to perform, he is evaluating ability to bond on an emotional level with virtual strangers.
19. An Architect who votes for a candidate wants someone with values like his, and a good sense of judgment. Ideally, he would like a clone of himself, who has time to serve in the stated position that he does not have.
A Medicator does not want someone like himself in the position; he wants someone much, much better.
20. An Architect doesn’t particularly care how many other Architects there are.
A Medicator wants everyone else to be a Medicator. Convert or die.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
[…] “A Medicator Wants Everyone Else to be a Medicator” Architects and Medicators “Please Give…” Americans Losing Faith in the American Dream Internet Grew 20% […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/17/2010 @ 07:27[…] Architects and Medicators…the latter of whom, sadly, only go through the motions of truly living life. Everything has […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/24/2010 @ 06:23[…] of Berkeley is discovering Architects and Medicators, I think. Medicators arrive at solutions to problems as the fulfullment of a quest for emotional […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/10/2010 @ 07:34[…] the latest to discover the Architect-and-Medicator paradigm. I must say, every year that I see roll on by, instills in me a tiny bit more reluctance […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/19/2010 @ 06:39[…] maintained for awhile that some of us, a good-sized chunk of us, come from a virtual-other-world, in which one is expected not to put in the effort. My theory is that these are quasi-adults, the […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/23/2010 @ 08:10[…] the latest to see the difference between Architects and Medicators. Architects tend to see property and wealth as compensation for time, services or goods. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/24/2010 @ 06:54[…] like Architects and Medicators to me. Medicators are fixated on what other people have, whereas Architects consider such a matter […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 06/03/2010 @ 06:35[…] gearing up for a giant Architects-and-Medicators […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/24/2010 @ 07:32[…] is an Architect/Medicator split. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: These people I call […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/31/2010 @ 06:16[…] Which half of humanity is to be accommodated by government, the Architects or the Medicators. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/08/2010 @ 08:21[…] The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. I strongly recommend this. Think of it as, in the conflict between Architects and Medicators, this is a productive argument in favor of the way Medicators do things. And I note the irony: Of […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/22/2010 @ 18:52[…] to concentrate on this other differential, the one that less clearly marked along gender lines; the Architect versus Medicator divide, the opportunity-versus-security […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/13/2011 @ 08:58[…] all other big decisions, the Presidential Election of 2012 can be decided the way Architects decide things or it can be decided the way Medicators decide things. If the voters in the Penn/Ohio/Fla triumvirate think like Architects, she will win, and if they […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/29/2011 @ 09:48[…] all other big decisions, the Presidential Election of 2012 can be decided the way Architects decide things or it can be decided the way Medicators decide things. If the voters in the Penn/Ohio/Fla triumvirate think like Architects, she will win, and if they […]
- “McCain: Palin Can Beat Obama” | Right Wing News | 05/29/2011 @ 10:04[…] since taken to calling these two types of people Architects and Medicators. Because let’s just get down to brass tacks here: Deep down, we all know it’s really […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 10/30/2011 @ 10:14[…] happens to them, and the people who live life according to the second social contract do not, the former end up being Architects and the latter end up being Medicators. Because that’s the definition. Something didn’t go the way the Architect wanted, he […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/09/2011 @ 07:54[…] happens to them, and the people who live life according to the second social contract do not, the former end up being Architects and the latter end up being Medicators. Because that’s the definition. Something didn’t go the way the Architect wanted, he […]
- Tiffany Gabbay Discovers Architects and Medicators | Right Wing News | 11/13/2011 @ 10:45[…] also notice these thinker/opportunity-over-security types, whom I’ve called the Architects, don’t really give a rip how many other people are also Architects, or how many other people […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/22/2012 @ 08:03[…] also notice these thinker/opportunity-over-security types, whom I’ve called the Architects, don’t really give a rip how many other people are also Architects, or how many other people […]
- Imitation is the Sincerest Form XXXVI | Right Wing News | 01/22/2012 @ 09:48[…] we get into a question about the Architect/Medicator divide, which I have a lot of trouble resolving, since I’m very far off on one side of the dividing […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/26/2012 @ 07:44[…] an architect-medicator divide. You aren’t going to convert anyone on either side of this yawning chasm; people who like it […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 02/13/2012 @ 08:13[…] is the Architect/Medicator divide, because the difference in world-visions has to do with recognition of a project perimeter. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/18/2012 @ 23:00[…] Architects and Medicators, there are many ways to define the difference, but of course there is an obvious problem with multiple definitions: When applied, they may […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/24/2012 @ 06:26I see large parts of the Medicator you describe in myself, and large parts of the Architect you describe in myself. And I see a lot of it not applying. [shrug]
- Dean Esmay | 03/27/2012 @ 05:33[…] have noticed there is a narrow band of authority altitude that is highly attractive to the Medicator mindset. You could think of it in military terms as Sergeant and Corporal ranks, but not as […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 04/22/2012 @ 04:49[…] a narrative. It’s a useful distinction to keep in mind. Brietbart, it seems, discovered the Architect/Medicator divide. Recycling and re-recycling a narrative is, after all, an excercise in self-medicating. The […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 04/24/2012 @ 06:39[…] Medicators medicate. It’s what they do. That’s why their situation is ever-constant: We’ve all been living through some interminable period of darkness, with the greedy selfish one percent dominating and oppressing everybody, at least, everybody who ought to matter. But the clock is stuck at almost-dawn, with the sun just about to peak over the hills in the East, and when it’s daylight the locks on the treasury will be shattered and the stolen fortunes will spill out in the streets and our champion will tell everyone to grab all they can, and the widows will be sustained and the babies will be fed and the awful oppressive meanie people will have big frowns on their faces as they realize how much they suck, and…and…and…we’re always right there, at the very last moments of the long dark night. Keep watching the hills in the East. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/01/2012 @ 06:32[…] okay. First impression: I need to update the Architect and Medicator thing, if only to help along my own understanding of the split, because this is an important […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/27/2012 @ 17:15[…] made a reference to the Architect and Medicator split last time I saw this take place, which I think was correct then and I think it is correct now. Back […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 05/31/2012 @ 06:42[…] the facts back up what I said, I think, and it does fall within the Architects and Medicators split. Some people see a complex system is not functioning as it should, their first impulse is to […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/06/2012 @ 07:35[…] is an Architect/Medicator conflict, as I later wrote: The “you-didn’t-build-ism” is an example of the […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/20/2012 @ 07:09[…] we know, is a government-sponsored, long-term, inter-generational effort to tilt the balance of Architects and Medicators. “Architect,” used here, refers not to the profession but to the personality type; it […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/25/2012 @ 08:47[…] a plurality of libs are taking issue with my definition of “Architects,” as in, Architects and Medicators, when I cite Hammurabi’s Code 229 (actually codes 229 through 233), which Wikipedia claims […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 08/02/2012 @ 09:25[…] a plurality of libs are taking issue with my definition of “Architects,” as in, Architects and Medicators, when I cite Hammurabi’s Code 229 (actually codes 229 through 233), which Wikipedia claims […]
- Memo For File CLXV | Right Wing News | 08/12/2012 @ 06:18[…] a plurality of libs are taking issue with my definition of “Architects,” as in, Architects and Medicators, when I cite Hammurabi’s Code 229 (actually codes 229 through 233), which Wikipedia claims […]
- Memo For File CLXV | Washington Rebel | 08/12/2012 @ 06:18[…] been to spend all of His resources and His energy marketing Himself to Medicators. Those would be the people who feel, feel, feel their way around every challenge in life and never think, think, thi… their way through a problem. They don’t give a rat’s rear end about anything in the […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/05/2012 @ 07:08[…] an Architects and Medicators thing. The Medicators, being in a state of constantly self-medicating, are preoccupied with feeling […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/19/2013 @ 05:50[…] generally — they won’t care that much. That’s because conservatives tend to be Architects, who respond to new situations by thinking, as opposed to Medicators who respond by feeli…. So! A liberal stands in front of a painting. The painting makes him feel a certain way. The barn […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/21/2013 @ 12:25[…] By and large, they do seem to have addictive personalities; I’ve said for years that Architects think, Medicators feel, and the conflict between these two seems like such an inevitability that I seriously wonder if […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 04/23/2013 @ 16:25[…] never realized much success at doing this. That is what is difficult about communicating with the those-who-feel types; they tend to figure out they’re enraged first & foremost, and then stay enraged no […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 06/09/2013 @ 08:54[…] into one of two “sides” of a grand, top-level division, and then I identified some safe generalizations to make about it. There is a cycle at work here: Each of these complex problems can be resolved in […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/21/2013 @ 13:15[…] all other divisions emerging merely as subsequent consequences of that. And then I identified some safe generalizations to make about it. There is a cycle at work here: Each of these complex problems can be resolved in […]
- Memo For File CLXXXII | Rotten Chestnuts | 07/21/2013 @ 14:21[…] broken-record recurring chorus about Architects and Medicators grew out of an understanding that when the miscreant appears in front of the magistrate to […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 08/24/2013 @ 07:18[…] broken-record recurring chorus about Architects and Medicators grew out of an understanding that when the miscreant appears in front of the magistrate to […]
- Enjoying the Culture of Poverty | Rotten Chestnuts | 08/25/2013 @ 21:41[…] Revenge of the Nerds? It happened. It came and it went. Now we’re medicating. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 01/05/2014 @ 22:10[…] believe, or am at least tinkering with the possibility that, he’s discovering Architects and Medicators, the former of whom are going to be in Column A because there’s no place else for them to be. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/19/2014 @ 03:42[…] Architects and Medicators. People who solve the problems they encounter by way of thought, versus people who address every thought-challenge by way of feeling, often losing sight of the difference between feeling & thought. The “cold civil war” is still cold, but it’s been heating up for awhile, and is approaching an ignition point as we close out Anno Domini Twenty Fourteen. […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 12/31/2014 @ 17:39[…] unfolding reality confounds those narratives, the experience doesn’t even faze them. They are Medicators, and as such, they exercise a “process of adjusting one’s emotional response to reality […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 02/08/2015 @ 12:27[…] just maybe, he was the first thinking man ever to stumble across the great divide. At least, we’re pretty sure he bothered to say something about […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 03/14/2015 @ 16:05[…] this is very similar to Morgan’s “architects vs. medicators” distinction. Anonymous Conservative’s r/K theory, on the other hand, makes these behaviors […]
- More on the Left and Autism | Rotten Chestnuts | 04/07/2015 @ 07:54[…] they are, is Medicators, drifting on through life by feeling their way around its challenges, rather than by thinking their […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 07/03/2015 @ 07:01[…] they are, is Medicators, drifting on through life by feeling their way around its challenges, rather than by thinking their […]
- Recent Hairpin Turns in Our Nationalized Moral Reasoning | H2o Positivo | 07/11/2015 @ 00:36[…] and chaos, and this was the inspiration behind that observation I made so many years ago, about Architects and Medicators, formerly Yin and Yang — two halves of humanity that actually should not be coming into […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/05/2015 @ 08:13[…] and chaos, and this was the inspiration behind that observation I made so many years ago, about Architects and Medicators, formerly Yin and Yang — two halves of humanity that actually should not be coming into […]
- Their Destructive Power | H2o Positivo | 09/06/2015 @ 05:29[…] is the contrast between the Architects and the Medicators, the former of whom think about things the way one must think about them, when one sets about the […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/23/2015 @ 06:20[…] recent lessons I’ve had that I’ll leave unmentioned here. And I’m reminded of something I wrote years ago about how different types of people get along, not with other people, but with […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 11/17/2016 @ 04:55[…] why I call them Medicators. They really are medicating, in a way. Making decisions more to go through the motions of making […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 08/31/2017 @ 03:33