Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
From Top Right News, which you’ll note adds on Steven Crowder’s somewhat incredulous reaction to President Obama’s attempt to equivocate.
Let’s hear it for high horses.
As far as the cosmetics of it, the “Greatest Speech Evar”-ness of it…if I agreed with the sentiments of it I’d have to say Obama did not present the position very well. I grew up here and I’ve heard this from the snotty kollege kids already, “What about the Crusades?? What about the Inquisition??” It isn’t an intriguing argument to me, it’s more like 35 years out of date. I’m certainly not going to show the desired reaction and go something like “ZOMG What is President Obama talking about?? To the encyclopedia I go!! What are these ‘crusades’??”
Instead, it’s more like (0:52)
Obama: “Remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition…”
Me: Yawn…
Obama: “..People committed…”
Me: Is this the part where someone finally gets specific? Please expound. Can’t wait.
Obama: “…terrible deeds in the name of Christ.”
Terrible deeds? So much for specifics.
I guess He’s talking about burning at the stake. That might compare to what we saw on the video that was released Tuesday. But, that’s still only a guess. What does He really have in mind? This is why it’s important to be specific.
Referring back to the first video, I have to wonder if “terrible deeds” refers to merely resisting a hostile takeover of the entire civilized world. Hey, stop resisting! That’s a terrible deed.
It’s like Ferguson all over again. President Obama consistently shows, along with a lot of other people, a disturbing fondness of portraying aggressors as victims. As anyone who’s been bullied in school knows fully well, this is what bullies do. They come up with false narratives, pass them off to people, and play-act like they’re the ones being bullied.
Related: William Teach writing at Pirate’s Cove: “I missed the part where Obama specifically said ‘horrible things in Mohammed’s name’.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I have a couple of heuristics for dealing with Leftist bullshit that I find useful, and would like to share. For instance, I will take a “climate change” alarmist’s claims seriously IFF he/she shows me pictures of the wind-powered yurt in which s/he now lives.
Similarly, I will take a moral equivalence argument seriously IFF the examples from both sides date to within the last thirty years. In this particular instance, not only were the Muzzies no angels themselves during the crusades, but they were the middlemen in the slave trade right up to…oh…. NOW. Otherwise, we might as well be holding show trials for the modern Mexican government based on the atrocities committed in Quetzalcoatl’s name.
- Severian | 02/06/2015 @ 10:40WOAH! I thought it was Mr. Biden’s job to distract from the “national conversation” when it wasn’t going the “correct” way, by saying stupid stuff, so Mr. Obama didn’t have to!
- CaptDMO | 02/06/2015 @ 13:57Was Ms. Shultz (or Mr., from MSNBC, for that matter) unavailable?
And while I’m on the “stupid stuff” rag, who actually wrote, and “fact checked”, Ambassador Rice’s latest
High School salutatorian speech?
I haven’t watched video of an Obama speech in a while, because the guy makes my skin crawl (Great speaker? Are we watching and listening to the same thing?), but does anyone else think he seemed more than usually out of it in these video clips? Almost drugged? The pauses and meandering gaze were far more than one would normally do just for effect. I just find the guy totally creepy.
What was with that whole “The starting point of some faith is some doubt …. not being so confident that you are right….”?
I mean, how are we supposed to take that in context of a man being burned alive in front of the world. That maybe we shouldnt’ think we’re in the right about that? That maybe ISIS has a point? Maybe I should stop and consider the guy might have had it coming? Really? REALLY, OBAMA?
I’m just sickened, absolutely sickened to have this man for my President.
- cloudbuster | 02/07/2015 @ 20:33It’s Santa Bot morality.
“Those men are beating that poor business owner for protection money! NAUGHTY! And that business owner refuses to pay the protection money! EQUALLY NAUGHTY!”
Futurama was primarily written by lefties, but they hit a lot of the notes bang-on.
- nightfly | 02/09/2015 @ 13:24