Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
D, as in Daniella Sarahyba; and E as in the legendary Erica Durance, who left “Smallville” viewers gasping for breath and wondering, briefly, if it wasn’t a horrible casting decision to make the latest Lois Lane so incredibly hot-looking. But, ultimately, not caring about that question as much as they thought they did.
At first glance, it seems Daniella enjoys a slight edge in the “this is what a woman’s body should look like” department. But it’s 2009, and the hot girls are all skinny, which is something of a shame. As readers have previously pointed out, Daniella’s just as rail-thin as any of ’em — and while I disagree with those readers about who looks better than who, they’re right as rain in matters of shape and form.
Both girls could use a cheeseburger and a milkshake. But they both offer a certain inner beauty, a style, a panache. Daniella’s cursory superiority in this contest, I’m sorry to say, is an illusion. It’s all in the hat. The darker tan is due to the lighting. The “tiebreaker” comes down to the girl-next-door look; Daniella has plenty of this, and it’s good, but what Erica has is just a bit more & better.
Advantage Erica. Your mileage may vary, as the saying goes.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Well, I guess in that alternate universe where this might even have come up, you and I wouldn’t have to fight over women.
I’m going with D.
Not that there’s anything wrong with E. And I’m a fan of cutoff denim, too. But D has the pose, the poise, and a certain “black and tan” thing going on with that bikini.
Plus I have ALWAYS been a sucker for women in hats.
- philmon | 09/03/2009 @ 06:41Whoa, that’s like buying the house because of the furniture and kitchen appliances in the display model.
Ah well. When the task at hand is figuring out which image is going to collect one’s drool, that’s quite a reasonable way to decide.
- mkfreeberg | 09/03/2009 @ 07:08Eggggzactly.
That’s why there’s the “courtship period” in a typical relationship. Because physical attraction has its place, but it ain’t everything.
- philmon | 09/03/2009 @ 07:29Damn you Morgan, I can’t decide.
Let them settle it, oil westling, in their panties…seems fair to me.
Yup, I went there…sue me, don’t care.
- tim | 09/03/2009 @ 09:02Ummm… I’ll wait to see what’s behind doors F and G. Maybe longer. I’ve got all kinds of time. 😉
Still and even… one hopes when this series gets to “R” and “Z” we’ll have Rubenesque and Zaftig as options. I ain’t holdin’ my breath, tho.
- bpenni | 09/03/2009 @ 15:25This is about appreciation, not frustration, so letters like Z we’ll probably be skipping.
You’re always welcome to nominate…
Trouble with the pudgy girls is, these days if a gal wants to show off a bod that has some roundness to it, more often than not she’s got a message to go with it. And it is NOT a pleasant one. Something to do with “societal expectations,” “patriarchal,” “stereotype,” and a bunch of other post-modern buzzwords…in which they aren’t making the cut here. But there are exceptions to all rules, including this one.
Nominate away, we’ll see how far it goes.
- mkfreeberg | 09/03/2009 @ 15:40Good going Tim,Morgan can keep his”sticks with boobs”
- kermitt | 09/03/2009 @ 16:06one hopes when this series gets to “R” and “Z” we’ll have Rubenesque and Zaftig as options.
Go you Buck – although I have noted for some years now that Morgan’s observation about “attitude” (which is unfortunately usually confused with “having a personality”) being a part of the big-girl persona is generally a given.
Too bad, that. Remember all those sweet-hearted girls with big bottoms?
- rob | 09/04/2009 @ 09:13Too bad, that. Remember all those sweet-hearted girls with big bottoms?
Excuse the vernacular, but… FUCK YEAH! Let’s just cue up Segar… to the effect of “I remember… I remember…” And fondly, at that.
Sorry for the sexual innuendo, digression, and altogether meaningless contribution to this blog, cylarz. I just couldn’t help myself this time, you frickin’ twit. 🙂
- bpenni | 09/04/2009 @ 21:39Alright. I’m officially staying out of this.
- philmon | 09/05/2009 @ 05:53[…] Durance, flush with victory after smacking down Daniella Sarahyba last week, today is confronted by Famke Janssen. Finding a bikini-picture of Famke, while it can be done, is […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 09/10/2009 @ 06:01