Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
I was pleased to see John Hughes took our offline discussion and posted it pretty much word for word. I’m surprised by how candid he is about things taking place behind the walls where my local newspaper is printed up.
I wish more people at the Sacramento Bee thought like Mr. Hughes. Some days, it seems his viewpoint is decidedly in the minority, and I wonder if he has all the job security of Fox Mulder.
Update 2-3-07: Due to moving some stuff around the site to get the now-excessively-large glossary to load, the address for the Doctrine of Equally Suspect Center has been moved to a new Doctrines page. You’ll understand the relevance after you read the Hughes piece. It has to do with notion that ideas become more reasonable, and therefore in need of reduced scrutiny or no scrutiny at all, when they are moved toward the middle of something.
A reminder that just because two sides stand opposed on an issue, and are vocal about their disagreement, it does not necessarily follow that the extremes are both nonsensical or damaging while some compromise between them is superior or meritorious. Oftentimes, the compromise is just as ludicrous as the least-correct extreme; sometimes, even moreso.
More behind the link. Simply put, one side of any given issue can be wrong. In fact in real life, it’s not at all unusual that all sides of an issue can be wrong…many’s the conundrum that inspires an abundance of possible solutions that are all bad, in all the ways that count.
So a militant and unconditional riveting to “moderation,” is nothing more than naked gutlessness. When persons in positions of power refuse or neglect to observe the Doctrine of Brittle Extremes, what they end up doing is eschewing courage and mandating that nobody beneath them demonstrate any courage either. They navigate the road ahead by subordinating their notions of where the destination is, to the notion of where the asphalt goes. The Doctrine, therefore, is an essential device in demonstrating true leadership; without it, anything pretending to be leadership would have to be done without absorbing or pondering the meaning of information.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.