Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Well…I must say, this is a little embarrassing. The anniversary ends with a zero, you would expect an unusually high level of solemnity and punctuality in observing the occasion. As it is, things are so quiet it seems there’s an expectation that the last survivor has expired, and we can move on. As is often the case with unhelpful messages, it isn’t stated syllable-for-syllable or word-for-word, it’s more of a perceptible stench. An absence of something. No movie promos. Hard to see any speeches or ceremonies taking place. Google’s page just has a search box and nothing else.
I can understand the desire to bury the past. There may even be good intentions behind it; Japan is not our enemy. Some people are more dovish than they were ten years ago, they’ve got their reasons and I can respect that.
But it just seems to me, there’s something wrong with your argument if the best shot it has of looking like the right one, arrives as a consequence of people not talking about something.
One of the lessons we have learned from Pearl Harbor, is that when a nation declares war on another, it’s at least possible for it to be unambiguously and incontestably in the right in doing so. If there is a political agenda in motion today that finds this message to be inconvenient, I don’t think it’s asking too much for said agenda to take a break for one day while a grateful nation remembers.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
An absence of something.
Not completely. From the Air Force Association’s Daily Report:
- bpenni | 12/07/2011 @ 11:52Also, something going on at Alameda. But all in all, much quieter and more subdued than in years past. I suppose I shouldn’t read too much into it, but I don’t mind telling you it makes me uncomfortable to see it this way.
- mkfreeberg | 12/07/2011 @ 12:08What Buck said. Thanks for posting that.
Additionally, I read today on Yahoo that over 100 Pearl survivors are not only still alive, but managed to make it to the ceremony. That’s saying something, considering that all of them are well into their 80s now, and even older.
There was an interesting marathon of documentaries on The Military Channel yesterday and today. One drew numerous comparisons between 12/7/41 and 09/11/01. Another explored the theory that there was a 5th Japanese mini sub which actually made it into the harbor during the air raid and may have been responsible for some of the damage done. We will never know for sure.
That said, it is interesting that it wasn’t headline news even on foxnews.com, or that Google finds time to alter its logo to commemorate every anniversary that’s important to the Left or every pet cause that it thinks needs promoting.
70 is a big number. This should have been bigger news – not just on remembering what happened and the lives lost, but some mention of the military and other doctrines put in place to be sure our country isn’t continually being caught with its pants down.
My position is that if our enemies were being reminded often enough that the US can and will strike pre-emptively and decisively, such attacks would never happen in the first place. But that would require competent and confident leadership, wouldn’t it?
- cylarz | 12/07/2011 @ 20:24