Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Hat tip to Bird Dog at Maggie’s Farm.
Of course it makes good sense that living things within an ecosystem have an effect on that ecosystem, and vice-versa. It’s a symbiotic relationship. Within the environmental movement, wherever science fails to show that we have to stop commercialism and development in order to continue surviving and/or become decent people, their special brand of religion will fill in the gaps. It’s a curious consistency they have about it: If a human did it, it must be poisonous. They’re not worried about cows releasing methane into the atmosphere, unless the cows are living on a farm run by a human, supplying a market of beef consumed by humans. Greenhouse gases are not the problem, in the environmental doctrine, the problem is that humans put them there. Anything humans put anywhere, is a problem.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I guess it came from the “discovery” that is the predominant greenhouse gas iswater vapor , and methane “sequestered” in glacial ice was there long before
man “discovered” cow farts.
I exist as a progressive liberator of all those natural sub terrainian carbon molocules, long imprisoned by the evil planet.
Freeeeeeeedommmmmmmmm…..
- CaptDMO | 03/17/2013 @ 03:35I love this! In the past decade, I’ve used this study to refute the BS from the Left: https://www.llnl.gov/news/newsreleases/2001/NR-01-04-08.html. Now, I’ve got this to go along with it. Additionally, I recently read The Deap, Hot Biosphere by Gold. Highly recommended.
- BillW. | 03/17/2013 @ 11:42Consider this: a living creature modifies its local environment by taking materials and creating a dam, thus modifying the local ecology to suit the living creature better.
If the living creature in question is a beaver, it’s OK and natural. But if we are talking about people, then the dam is evil and unnatural. Seems like an example of “Anything humans put anywhere, is a problem.”
- Captain Midnight | 03/17/2013 @ 23:00