Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Got a big controversy over the above photograph. She’s a local lady here, who’s created a national uproar. I guess it’s the “What’s Your Excuse?” line rubbing some people the wrong way.
Jack Armstrong of Armstrong & Getty was complaining that her occupation has been toned down, failing to find mention in articles like this one. She’s some kind of fitness trainer or something. So I guess the rebuttal would be…”my excuse is that I’m not a fitness trainer”? And it would seem I can throw stones like everyone else at hapless Maria, since I’m not a fitness trainer either and I seem to have packed on thirty pounds plus over the last couple years. So pass the rock and let’s get in line, right?
Sorry, no dice. This is not about fat.
There are two kinds of people in the world. Some say, “if one guy did it anywhere, that means anybody else who wants to, can do it everywhere.” The other kind say, “if one guy somewhere can’t do it, then nobody else should be able to do it either.” Perhaps the Facebook ladies getting all pissed off at Ms. Kang have hit a compromise: “I’m willing to do what it takes to get the weight off, so long as nobody, anywhere, does or says anything to make me feel bad.” It’s that last set that is the problem here, not Maria Kang. You have to choose your battles. The fact is, a lot of people who have weight problems simply want to have everything as good as they can possibly have it, every waking minute of every day. Why get a Quarter Pounder, when there’s a Double Quarter Pounder right next to it for only another dollar? “She said something that rubbed me the wrong way, now I must start a revolution” — that’s just an extension of that. Feel feel feel, every situation that comes along, it’s all about how it makes you feel. That’s how people put on weight.
You know, there are certain truisms about criticism, whether the criticism is personalized or not: Criticism is almost never one hundred percent on-the-money. It’s always wrong somewhere. But it very seldom entirely misses the mark, either. You have to, as the adage goes, “take what you like and leave the rest.” In the case of criticism, nobody likes any of it, so what you need to do is take what will help you and improve your situation…and leave the rest. Did Maria Kang’s flippant comment entirely miss the mark? With everyone?
Let’s answer that question with another question: Are the complaining-people not answering her question rather directly? “My excuse is that you’re making me feel bad about myself.” And in so doing, are they not proving the question has more than a little merit? “What’s your excuse” means, boiled down to its essentials, “how little does it take to make you abandon your goal of a better body?” And the answer is “some stranger on Facebook posting pictures I don’t like.” Pretty low bar. So there’s opportunity for improvement there.
The real tragedy is this: That is precisely the problem Ms. Kang was trying to solve, if I’m reading her message right. And I think I am. She took the time and trouble to reach the emotionally sensitive types, the kind of people who aren’t inclined to say “no pain no gain,” just-do-it, the kind who have not yet pushed past that first milestone. The must-feel-good-all-the-time types. And, those are exactly the ones who are biting her head off over it.
We can have a legitimate argument over whether or not she deployed sufficient tact. But she was trying to help. And the fact is, these people can’t admit that they’re the ones who have the problem. They’re showing the real reason why they don’t look as good as Maria Kang, from the neck down, and nothing is going to change there until something changes between the ears. That makes the whole thing personal, and a bit nasty. Maria Kang didn’t make it that way and neither did I.
Cross-posted at Right Wing News and Rotten Chestnuts.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I’ve seen a bit about this. I haven’t read the lefty commentary — there’s only so much time and tylenol in the world — but really, who needs to? It’s always the same.
It strikes me that there are two ways of describing Ms. Kang. One starts with “she has made the decision that….”; the other starts with “she’s the kind of person who….”
Conservatives, too, have an unfortunate tendency to use the “kind of person” phrasing, but liberals always do. She’s the kind of person who conforms to patriarchal beauty standards. She’s the kind of person who is vain, shallow, looks-obsessed, etc. You could force them at gunpoint to describe Ms. Kang for an hour straight, and never once would you hear anything approaching agency come out of their mouths. According to them, Ms. Kang has never made a decision in her life; she’s the kind of person who conforms to beauty standards; she could no more skip a workout than she could skip breathing.
More tellingly, liberals describe themselves this way. They don’t work out because they are the kind of people who don’t buy into your heteronormative capitalist beauty system, man. Even when they do decide to dress up or put on makeup (and behold the agonies of a feminist girl who wants to have a traditional pretty princess wedding*), it’s always freighted with politics, because they’re the type of people who care about this type of thing.**
It’s never “Ms. Kang has made the decision that having that body is worth X hours in the gym, N times a week; I disagree, and so instead of the hitting the treadmill I’m going to hit the buffet line. Those delicious pastries are worth a few extra pounds of flab.”
.
.
.
* don’t worry, that’s a link to a dude making wonderful sport of Ms. Valenti and her matrimonial woes.
**And somehow it always turns out that the right thing to do politically is the thing they want to do anyway. Valenti wants to have a pretty princess wedding, but she’s all up in arms that gays can’t get married…. so she’ll have her pretty princess wedding, but ask people to donate to “marriage equality causes” in lieu of flowers. Not even silly putty is as flexible as liberal “principles.”
- Severian | 10/17/2013 @ 07:21[…] Fail Maria Kang Winnable? “A New Variety of Privilege” The Shutdown Drama is Over Five Ton Flatbed […]
- House of Eratosthenes | 10/18/2013 @ 07:44