Alarming News: I like Morgan Freeberg. A lot.
American Digest: And I like this from "The Blog That Nobody Reads", because it is -- mostly -- about me. What can I say? I'm on an ego trip today. It won't last.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: We were following a trackback and thinking "hmmm... this is a bloody excellent post!", and then we realized that it was just part III of, well, three...Damn. I wish I'd written those.
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler: ...I just remembered that I found a new blog a short while ago, House of Eratosthenes, that I really like. I like his common sense approach and his curiosity when it comes to why people believe what they believe rather than just what they believe.
Brutally Honest: Morgan Freeberg is brilliant.
Dr. Melissa Clouthier: Morgan Freeberg at House of Eratosthenes (pftthats a mouthful) honors big boned women in skimpy clothing. The picture there is priceless--keep scrolling down.
Exile in Portales: Via Gerard: Morgan Freeberg, a guy with a lot to say. And he speaks The Truth...and it's fascinating stuff. Worth a read, or three. Or six.
Just Muttering: Two nice pieces at House of Eratosthenes, one about a perhaps unintended effect of the Enron mess, and one on the Gore-y environ-movie.
Mein Blogovault: Make "the Blog that No One Reads" one of your daily reads.
The Virginian: I know this post will offend some people, but the author makes some good points.
Poetic Justice: Cletus! Ah gots a laiv one fer yew...
Texas Rainmaker debunks the Lancet Survey.
Do those look like equally solid debunkings to you? Because the second one I’m still trying to figure out. I’m over thirty; I can remember the seventies; I remember the magazines and news clips very well. That guy’s trying to tell me it didn’t happen. Some of his links, in fact, support the notion that it did.
I guess debunking things is like opening a bag of cereal, you can do it well or you can do it half-assed.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Well, I do agree with the guy that the scientific journals weren’t excactly stuffed with studies insisting that we were on the cusp of an ice age, nor was the press whipped up into the hysteria it is today. However, articles were there, and they were taken seriously. And keep in mind this was before the anti-human religion of environmentalism had blossomed into the full-blown institution it is today.
The point is, science is the art of the educated guess. Some guesses are better than others. The point is that educated guesses can go either way (ever notice, though, that nobody’s predicting the climate will stay essentially the same? Ask yourself, why might that be? And what advantages are there to predicting disaster one way or the other?). Science is a useful tool which can help us gain an understanding of the world around us, but it is far from infallible — especially when our base knowledge on the subject being addressed is quite limited.
Remember, butter was bad for you, margarine was good. Then it turned out butter is actually better for you than margarine. Eggs? Bad! Cholesterol city. But wait. Turns out, there’s good cholesterol. Eggs are ok. I’m sure we could find many more examples.
Acting rashly on predictions that don’t seem to have any discernible supporting physical evidence — especially on the scale Bigfoot Al and his minions are talking about – is stupidity.
By the way, I had two eggs for breakfast this morning.
- philmon | 03/06/2007 @ 11:11